Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

Megalodon Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings, Official CR 2.0 Video feature of the best evidence,videos, and proof fo the msonter submarine shark they call the megalodon shark. ➨ Most Recent UFO Sightings: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjMRDWcPlnt1GnrBtp4RC-g ➨ Science & Tech: https://www.CryptidResearch.com/ _ - SUBSCRIBE , FOLLOW & LIKE PLEASE, THANK YOU - _ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjMRDWcPlnt1GnrBtp4RC-g https://www.facebook.com/dmc.vids2 https://twitter.com/DMCVids The Megalodon shark caught on tape, slender man, alien sightings, ufo caught on tape, bigfoot sightings, extraterrestrial life on mars, aliens on the moon, iss ufo, nasa footage, and other topics such as ghosts, real dragons, new technology, new discovery , and other topics we will be discussing on DMCVids.

Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings sentiment_very_dissatisfied 6756

Shark videos 7 years ago 6,295,967 views

Megalodon Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings, Official CR 2.0 Video feature of the best evidence,videos, and proof fo the msonter submarine shark they call the megalodon shark. ➨ Most Recent UFO Sightings: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjMRDWcPlnt1GnrBtp4RC-g ➨ Science & Tech: https://www.CryptidResearch.com/ _ - SUBSCRIBE , FOLLOW & LIKE PLEASE, THANK YOU - _ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjMRDWcPlnt1GnrBtp4RC-g https://www.facebook.com/dmc.vids2 https://twitter.com/DMCVids The Megalodon shark caught on tape, slender man, alien sightings, ufo caught on tape, bigfoot sightings, extraterrestrial life on mars, aliens on the moon, iss ufo, nasa footage, and other topics such as ghosts, real dragons, new technology, new discovery , and other topics we will be discussing on DMCVids.

Show More

Advertising
LuxoGear Emergency Whistles with Lanyard

LuxoGear Emergency Whistles with Lanyard

Shop now »
NOCO Genius GEN5X2, 2-Bank, 10A (5A/Bank) Smart Marine Battery Chargers

NOCO Genius GEN5X2, 2-Bank, 10A (5A/Bank) Smart Marine Battery Charger

Shop now »
ADVERTISING
LuxoGear Emergency Whistles with Lanyard

LuxoGear Emergency Whistles with Lanyard

Shop now »
NOCO Genius GEN5X2, 2-Bank, 10A (5A/Bank) Smart Marine Battery Chargers

NOCO Genius GEN5X2, 2-Bank, 10A (5A/Bank) Smart Marine Battery Charger

Shop now »
RHINO USA Boat Trailer Transom Straps (2PK)

RHINO USA Boat Trailer Transom Straps (2PK)

Shop now »
LUCKY Kayak Portable Fish Depth Finder

LUCKY Kayak Portable Fish Depth Finder

Shop now »
Seaview 180 V3 Full Face Snorkel Mask

Seaview 180 V3 Full Face Snorkel Mask

Shop now »

Most popular comments
for Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

Jim Bklyn
Jim Bklyn - 7 years ago
Captain, "were going need a bigger boat" !
Earth and Beyond
Earth and Beyond - 7 years ago
+Jim Bklyn that's best movie
Anthony Platt
Anthony Platt - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn lol
Jason Martin
Jason Martin - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkjklkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Teresa Maduro
Teresa Maduro - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn xjgh
Rick Enbacker
Rick Enbacker - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn :-) loooooool
Chris Chris
Chris Chris - 7 years ago
Ha Megalodon Shark MY A$$, Baskin Shark it is a Harmless innocent Shark thats BIG!!!
rikiwakwak
rikiwakwak - 7 years ago
Farewell and adieu to you fare spanish ladies, Farewell and adieu to you ladies of Spain, for we've recieved orders, for to sail back to Boston, and so nevermore shall we see you again.
Krille T
Krille T - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn
Sharaya McCallum
Sharaya McCallum - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn Haha lol now that's funny shit! But far out So true tho aye'
Michael Slack
Michael Slack - 7 years ago
its swimmin...
Randy Crick
Randy Crick - 7 years ago
swimming
Fliptrick 515
Fliptrick 515 - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn a damn good movie of it's time!! JAWS
Nick Mionie
Nick Mionie - 7 years ago
real original...
Chris Schanzlin
Chris Schanzlin - 7 years ago
Swimming, not sleeping...you were close.
Irineo Romero
Irineo Romero - 7 years ago
Right Sean, hadn't even thought about it :) .
Labcabin96
Labcabin96 - 7 years ago
well what is it then smart guy since you know so much?
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker - 7 years ago
In my reality it was "You're gonna need a bigger butt."
JR Irizarry
JR Irizarry - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn i
Oshea Ferrero
Oshea Ferrero - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn here's to sleeping with bow legged women
johnnie1600
johnnie1600 - 7 years ago
LOL. "what are you Hooper, some kind of half-assed astronaut!"
barefoot191
barefoot191 - 7 years ago
I'm not talkin' about pleasure cruisin'. I'm talkin' about sharkin',
Sean H
Sean H - 7 years ago
Irineo Romero ..or the keel of a capsized sailboat.
BraverHawk6713 !xboxlive!
BraverHawk6713 !xboxlive! - 7 years ago
Jim Bklyn mendella effect
Irineo Romero
Irineo Romero - 7 years ago
Sorry to spoil the party guys. That fin first shown is anything but a great white's. Its dorsal fin resembles a perfect triangle ▲.
Denounce Rush
Denounce Rush - 7 years ago
It's always been "You're gonna need a bigger boat."
It was an ad-lib.
nicksfix8609
nicksfix8609 - 7 years ago
"You're gonna need a bigger bout" it changed since the realities have merged damn Mandella Effect
Rashandah Hunter
Rashandah Hunter - 7 years ago
true
Riz P
Riz P - 7 years ago
the shark is not 50 feet. it's 49 and a half feet.
Earth and Beyond
Earth and Beyond - 7 years ago
+Riz P haha
Deborah Campbell
Deborah Campbell - 7 years ago
This is why I like the pool!
Earth and Beyond
Earth and Beyond - 7 years ago
+Deborah Campbell same
Deborah Campbell
Deborah Campbell - 7 years ago
This is why I like the pool!
Pauly
Pauly - 7 years ago
they dont exist anymore. i explored the ocean already.
Earth and Beyond
Earth and Beyond - 7 years ago
+Paulus Maximus oh nice thanks for don't that
Dan Bugenhagen
Dan Bugenhagen - 7 years ago
why is the ocean overrated, you don't make sense,did you mean underrated.
Earth and Beyond
Earth and Beyond - 7 years ago
+Dan Bugenhagen yea you're right
carlos braga
carlos braga - 7 years ago
nao é o mega porque ele mede 59 ft
Jeremy OBanion
Jeremy OBanion - 7 years ago
that shark at 5 minutes into video is the 6 gill shark. It's big real big. Can eat most things in one bit. Because it's a bottom feeder. just about everything it will eat is already dead.

10. comment for Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

Christopher Akerley
Christopher Akerley - 7 years ago
just the begining
[i]
[i] - 7 years ago
It's a submarine stupid
Tae Lyn Allison
Tae Lyn Allison - 7 years ago
count gill slits meggies have 7 modern have 5 you find huge shark 7 gill slits u got a maggie
Leif Angus
Leif Angus - 7 years ago
I caught a megalodon last week in the book of Guinness..
Scott McMan
Scott McMan - 7 years ago
We have to consider the delicate nature of shark reproduction when considering this species. Remember, in order to witness such a creature, you fist have to contemplate the idea that a breeding population would have to exist in order for a sighting to take place. Unless, you are seeing the last Megalodon. I think most sightings are misidentifications, but I'm not stupid enough to discount the possibility. When people are so bold, to think they know for sure, they are not who you want to listen to. Keep an open mind, but use your logic and be intelligent about these things. Look for Occam's Razor in everything and you'll find that 99.99% of the time, there is an explanation. It would be great if Meg's were out there, but I'm not so sure a true ID would be a good thing. You'd have nuts out there killing off basking sharks and Greenland sharks, whale sharks, etc....thinking they'll be famous. We've already killed off too many sharks and it's disrupting the delicate balance of the ocean's ecosystem, along with global warming, over-fishing and pollution.
Ken 360
Ken 360 - 7 years ago
Maybe it is a Basking shark. basking shark is HUGE.
Ed Rollins
Ed Rollins - 7 years ago
Looks like a Basking Shark to me
Willy Reddick
Willy Reddick - 7 years ago
hhgn nlbansnshw
Anthony Roberts Jr
Anthony Roberts Jr - 7 years ago
true sharks well not should not eat people if they were not hungery and lol spoke are langue would teach them
Brian Jackson
Brian Jackson - 7 years ago
megalodon,bigfoot,the kracken,and aliens ...just afew things we wont see for another 100 years or so

20. comment for Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

Mad Fritz
Mad Fritz - 7 years ago
I like to meet the Megalodon in a Game.....
Tommy von Muttonfudge
Tommy von Muttonfudge - 7 years ago
Mad Fritz "Wasted'
Bones Lopez
Bones Lopez - 7 years ago
Z root canal
Joe Curr
Joe Curr - 7 years ago
Megalodon is extinct, reality check completed.
SurpriseEggTV
SurpriseEggTV - 7 years ago
Some of this Sharks are Basket Sharks.... But good Video, like!!!
Fresh Cakes
Fresh Cakes - 7 years ago
this is why i stay my white ass out of the ocean!
Shameful Positions
Shameful Positions - 7 years ago
Pink elephant spotted flying over London.
nancy hadders
nancy hadders - 7 years ago
why not a Megalodon Shark........Oceans havent changed in million years.... just believe in the anchient :)
Albert Baird
Albert Baird - 7 years ago
No meglodon here. They became extinct 1.5 million years ago according to science. Or did they. In 1874 the HMCS Challenger a British naval ship. Set out on a scientific journey to map the oceans depths. The first of its kind. In April of 1875 they plumbed the depths of the Marianas trench. A spot now called the Challenger channel. In dredging parts of the bottom a very large shark tooth was brought up. Many years later the tooth kept in the British museum. Was carbon dated. It was found to be 40 thousand years old.
Orcun Özgün
Orcun Özgün - 7 years ago
so fany
Destiny Gibson
Destiny Gibson - 7 years ago
i looks real but i can be anything from what we are looking at it is a big shark

30. comment for Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

KT OR
KT OR - 7 years ago
Das sind andere Haie. Der eine ist ein Riesenhai, ein anderer ein Sechskiemerhai. das mit dem Boot ist Fake
Kevin Crocilla
Kevin Crocilla - 7 years ago
EXACTLY.... Why in the hell are we going on and on about space. The cost, the fuel, the danger, etc. We have oceans right here under our feet. There is literally zero travel compared to space exploration. Why cant some billionaire or group of billionaires with the help of a public fund as well as a government grant, do a deep sea, 1 year exploration of the marianas trench (sp?) the deepest place on earth. I wanna see giant squid, i wanna see megladon, i wanna see MONSTERS!!! I want to see UFO bases!!!! It would be a fraction of the cost of any space exploration mission. It would be a hell of a lot easier. We'd get quicker results. I dont know why this hasnt happened yet!? Fuck Space, whos with me?!
Jennifer Brewer
Jennifer Brewer - 7 years ago
Our oceans are so vast and so unexplored that we truly have no idea what might be swimming around out there. I hope Megalodon is extinct for our sake, but who can say one way or the other?
Brazo John
Brazo John - 7 years ago
Could be a whale sharks.?
stevo f
stevo f - 7 years ago
I
Octavian Caesar Hibernicus
Octavian Caesar Hibernicus - 7 years ago
my God, I thought they died out millions of years ago,wow!
MITCHELL BELL
MITCHELL BELL - 7 years ago
seeing is believing
Mister Burgundy
Mister Burgundy - 7 years ago
This beat is sick.
remi
remi - 7 years ago
I've just read that according to statistics, donkeys kill more people every year than sharks.I'd better watch my ass.
Ineke Mateman
Ineke Mateman - 7 years ago
Charcarendon Megalodon's are extinct!
Stecki s
Stecki s - 7 years ago
Das letzte war ein Walhai...
Mark Keating
Mark Keating - 7 years ago
The main problem with obtaining actual specimens of these sharks is that those that wash up on shore are quickly eaten by local bigfoot families, those that aren't are whisked away by UFO's.
Paul Wood
Paul Wood - 7 years ago
if this is real it changes the apex predator chart.
Eckhardt Hemkemeier
Eckhardt Hemkemeier - 7 years ago
What a sh....
Andrei Dumitru
Andrei Dumitru - 7 years ago
;-);-);-);-);-);-);-);-);-);-);-);-)★★★★★
luis mora
luis mora - 7 years ago
i think megalodon is still alive!
Genevieve Simonet
Genevieve Simonet - 7 years ago
We are in the Piscesian Age, A New Millennium 'the Megaladon' Shark Is last Millennium the age of this Enormous Shark 1,000 years at least and I'm so glad they caught it!! . I' grew up watching films about legends, beasts, mythological monsters and legends we never believed to be true, like giant octopus, Sea Dragons not to mention Moby Dick (the white whale) and Nemo (40 Leeds Under the Sea). To the brave men who caught this Legendary Shark Thank you!!!
Kevin Bransky
Kevin Bransky - 7 years ago
If half of the species in the oceans are expected to go extinct by 2050, I doubt prehistoric creatures in the oceans or on land do not exist. Use some logic, not fantasy.
christopher reeves
christopher reeves - 7 years ago
Nope
Antonius Moroinius
Antonius Moroinius - 7 years ago
GODZILLA.......GODZILLA

50. comment for Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

ТИКИ БУМ!!!
ТИКИ БУМ!!! - 7 years ago
я одна тут русская?
Руслан Колесников
Руслан Колесников - 7 years ago
Там китовая акула в основном!
NATHAN LARSEN
NATHAN LARSEN - 7 years ago
i love sharks and i think they still exist
Patrick Hassan
Patrick Hassan - 7 years ago
Icelandic sharks for some of the pictures
Rob Carlson
Rob Carlson - 7 years ago
gonna debunk you dreams now, if it did exists its probably dead due to the lack of food supply for where most accusations of where it is!
ALEJANDRO Nava
ALEJANDRO Nava - 7 years ago
some of those are whales, shark whales, and that shark with the big mouth. maybe one or two seem like legit mega sharks.
Ronald De Jong
Ronald De Jong - 7 years ago
We gonna need a bigger boat.
Thunder Flame0122
Thunder Flame0122 - 7 years ago
SORRY AND THE OTHERS ARE SLIPER SHARK
Thunder Flame0122
Thunder Flame0122 - 7 years ago
NOPE ALL IS BASKING SHARK... IF THE ONE FOOTAGE IS THE MEGALODON HE COULD HAVE GET EATEN
Andrew Doe
Andrew Doe - 7 years ago
Concerning that these so-called experts don't know a basking shark when they see one...
Pedro Gebara
Pedro Gebara - 7 years ago
Baleia porra
Rodolfo Rodrigo
Rodolfo Rodrigo - 7 years ago
minha
rola e maior
Christian Pires
Christian Pires - 7 years ago
thats a whale shark
Ɉᴀᴋᴇʏ ᴛʜᴇ Cᴀᴋᴇʏ
Ɉᴀᴋᴇʏ ᴛʜᴇ Cᴀᴋᴇʏ - 7 years ago
given the fact that a 1.5 foot long shark tooth was found in 1871, which was carbon dated to be only 10k years old (over a million years after the ice age that supposedly wiped them out) I'd say that's enough evidence to at least keep the claim alive
Red Evo
Red Evo - 7 years ago
good dope music bro !!!
John Hudgens
John Hudgens - 7 years ago
I was married to one, once.Good Old Meg. with seal meat always
stuck in her teeth
Cerberus WWE
Cerberus WWE - 7 years ago
Would be better if someone had a go pro, put it underwater and caught the shark underwater to see if it were actually a mega or just an overly sized white shark or a new kind of shark. The ocean yes has only been like 5% discovered, I believe megaladon is still out there hiding in the depths, but you also have to think, a huge shark like that needs a lot of food, hence a lot of our whales could possibly go extinct from Megaladon if it is truly out there unless it's found something new to pray on. I'm just putting that out there, keep that in mind, but I still do believe in them. But it would be better if someone had a GoPro under water when the 'monster shark' swam by, so then you could tell 100% or at least 80% even
XxMrRoachxX
XxMrRoachxX - 7 years ago
All the big ones here are greenland sharks. Nowhere near the body structure of a great white which a megalodon should be very similar to
underfell sans
underfell sans - 7 years ago
and that is a whale shark
underfell sans
underfell sans - 7 years ago
that is not a megalodon that is a basking sharck
Thomas Schweiger
Thomas Schweiger - 7 years ago
bei 2:47 ist it a Riesenhai and no megalodon. And the first picture sind fake. bei 5:36 ist es ein Tiefseehai und der am stand gespülten hai ist auch nur ein Riesenhai gewesen.
Funny Studio
Funny Studio - 7 years ago
Where abouts was this sighting
Rusyan Van Den Berg
Rusyan Van Den Berg - 7 years ago
cant wait for the me movie
Dev Sharma
Dev Sharma - 7 years ago
What's that 1943 image..my gosh
kenpoarniceguy1
kenpoarniceguy1 - 7 years ago
Are you nuts!? If that's a Megladon, then I'm a mongoose!!
brian hernandez
brian hernandez - 7 years ago
one of the video sharks is not the mega lodon it's a Chinese shark it's big but not big enough for a mega lodon
gozilla 2014
gozilla 2014 - 7 years ago
megalodons just chill in the deep not like other sharks that hunt in shallow. remember this is a phrehistoric shark that lurks only in the deep
Robims
Robims - 7 years ago
the megalodon is just 25 m Long ;)
Brandon Branham
Brandon Branham - 7 years ago
jump in and find out
imy
imy - 7 years ago
BIGGER BOAT WITH BIGGER BALLS.
Angel Pagan
Angel Pagan - 7 years ago
if there is a megadon shark it's living so deep that you would need a submarine an it's a very big ocean Angel no wings or haloy
TheXMousex
TheXMousex - 7 years ago
5:29 Sleeper Shark
TimeTwist
TimeTwist - 7 years ago
i once saw a dorsal fin (that looked like a catfish) come out of the water about 2 feet without seeing the fish back in a muddy river in iowa (ya, i know that is ridiculous) so what might be in the ocean?? sigh...
M. Colby
M. Colby - 7 years ago
3:59 could this be the monster shark, Megalodon?
Either way. Dude in kajak is fucked!
Volkan Aksoy
Volkan Aksoy - 7 years ago
seyrederken bile tırsıyom bide denizde görsem kalbimiz yerinden çıkar çok büyük
XCraye X Global Gang
XCraye X Global Gang - 7 years ago
look ive Caught a Mermaid on a Cruise its gonna be on the News
Bat Fink
Bat Fink - 7 years ago
If megalodon isn't extinct yet , it soon will be thanks to Fukushima...
gee mail
gee mail - 7 years ago
1:00 who took the picture?
Bruce David
Bruce David - 7 years ago
just like the GIANT BOAR
''they will kill it''
don't they always
S1L3NTS0LD13R
S1L3NTS0LD13R - 7 years ago
The chances of it existing grow slimmer everyday.
Bryan Preston
Bryan Preston - 7 years ago
Makes one wonder??
Pedr Browne
Pedr Browne - 7 years ago
100% Fact
Frederiksted St. Croix
Frederiksted St. Croix - 7 years ago
I want one for my aquarium.
jon morgera
jon morgera - 7 years ago
hoopa
jon morgera
jon morgera - 7 years ago
hooper drives the boat chief
Jasna Strona Mocy Esyeczki
Jasna Strona Mocy Esyeczki - 7 years ago
So meany shuszi
10TEN 10
10TEN 10 - 7 years ago
Scientists believe that if the megalodon is in existence it would be mobile a depths we can't reach at the moment. To all the nay sayers out there, the great white and crocodile have lasted since dinosaur times why not another species?
aaron reay
aaron reay - 7 years ago
meglodon would be very stubby like a heavy great white but just way bigger like a torpedo of muscle
SocialistIntrovert
SocialistIntrovert - 7 years ago
Go explore the damn sea!!
Bubba D
Bubba D - 7 years ago
When the shark jumps out of the water and swallows the helicopter call me...
gamergman0105
gamergman0105 - 7 years ago
Actually megaladons do exist it's just that they are ALL the way down at the bottom of the ocean and when the volcano erupt back 500 million years ago the stuff didn't get into the water that much which kept the megaladons still alive!

100. comment for Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

Benet Fleck
Benet Fleck - 7 years ago
Not too many people realize that the famous line, "We're going to need a bigger boat", actually is from the film, "Titanic".
SilentPrayingmanTis
SilentPrayingmanTis - 7 years ago
Don't give up hope. Supposedly there's a book that sais the earth was drastically different about 4400 years ago and then there was a great flood that changed everthing including the environment.
KP Let's Play
KP Let's Play - 7 years ago
OK This Video is Creepy :) Angst
james mccormack
james mccormack - 7 years ago
Dead lifeless eyes....Like dolls eyes....!!
Affiliate Marketing Training
Affiliate Marketing Training - 7 years ago
Jaws daddy is in the house.
Dejuan Barnett
Dejuan Barnett - 7 years ago
it's already been documented that the chances are very low. megalodons needed lots of food and they would feed on whales. if megalodons were still around they would kill just about anything in the ocean and we would be wandering why the numbers of whales, great whites and squid were dropping. they would throw off the balance. no new teeth have been found and we haven't witnessed whales washing up on beaches bit in half. they would leave a bite so big that news would of been out. I am 100 percent sure megalodons went extinct. it's already been said they could of evolved into a smaller shark which wouldn't make them megalodons anymore. a predator that size wouldn't be able to stay hidden this long. that is a fact
banty boss
banty boss - 7 years ago
That beat though!
get off my lawn
get off my lawn - 7 years ago
As my dad, who was an avid lifelong fisherman always said: There are a lot bigger fish in the ocean than what's ever been taken out of it.
Sir Rickyrick
Sir Rickyrick - 7 years ago
Hooper! starboard ain't ya watchin it!
Movie Man Fan
Movie Man Fan - 7 years ago
Oceans are so deep and huge we are still finding new species everyday even on land in the forest, wiping them out unfortunately by deforestation, over fishing and pollution.
JUSTACHIPN
JUSTACHIPN - 7 years ago
I have Megabologna in my fridge now ... what's the big deal ...
Dr. Sebastian Wolf, M.D.
Dr. Sebastian Wolf, M.D. - 7 years ago
Simple enough....the large sharks at the end of the video are Greenland sharks. HUGE.
The other large shark, before, was a Basking shark! HUGE, but harmless....unless you're a krill.

I do believe there are sharks, ranging from 20-28 feet. But they are rare Great Whites. Megaladons are simply.....extinct.
In my humble opinion.....
WotBlitzWorld
WotBlitzWorld - 7 years ago
I'm never swimming again!
Beryl Zaidan
Beryl Zaidan - 7 years ago
bigger boat to hook that shark captain???
GWB123
GWB123 - 7 years ago
These pics are the exact reason i don't even wade in the ocean
Mr Wes Cupido
Mr Wes Cupido - 7 years ago
fossil records? where are these fossils? sharks have no bones that can fossilize. mega fauna existed and this monster could still be out there.
Caz Green
Caz Green - 7 years ago
Hate seeing anything dead and washed up like that, its so sad!
Colin R
Colin R - 7 years ago
I've heard landing a megalodon can take a whole week.
Johnathan Scofield
Johnathan Scofield - 7 years ago
not saying those are not great Clips of big sharks but there is plenty of ocean to keep looking but I would bring a pair of brown pants in case it headed south in a bad situation
Steven Hamilton
Steven Hamilton - 7 years ago
JAWS
Twitch Paa
Twitch Paa - 7 years ago
thats ture
Nick Wong
Nick Wong - 7 years ago
Too late to explore the continents, too early to explore the universe, just in time to study the vast depths of the ocean.
benjamin massie
benjamin massie - 7 years ago
there are still  undiscovered things in the oceans we have not jnown about
Darkfreak Rubyshine
Darkfreak Rubyshine - 7 years ago
Yeees! come to daddy!<3
I'll be very happy if this monster is out there..
My favorite monster-pet of all time!
Mark Jacob
Mark Jacob - 7 years ago
i keep an open mind to someday a mega shark say 60 or even 70 feet long is found.,.not saying there is, but to listen to the crazy talk about aliens and big foot,i give a megladon shark a more realistic possibility.
J1 Patman
J1 Patman - 7 years ago
got one in my pool
Go Away
Go Away - 7 years ago
I told my bff Magelodons are real it she still don't believe me. I can't wait intil she gets bit by one.
MrMoonwalkingBear
MrMoonwalkingBear - 7 years ago
Not that big caught one last week that was bigger
Ahmad Elakour
Ahmad Elakour - 7 years ago
I been catching fish my whole life and I guarantee this is fake I'm a fisherman by trade and I seen big fish swimming
Duane Townley
Duane Townley - 7 years ago
fukushimas taking care of any pesky marine life in the oceans.
mark halley
mark halley - 7 years ago
just saying iv never seen a great white pup maybe great whites are megaladon pups? lol
Juan Espinosa
Juan Espinosa - 7 years ago
It's highly unlikely that Megalodons are swimming out there. The Great White shark, a sibling of the Megalodon, is roughly half the size and is in danger of extinction because they can't find enough nourishment due to overfishing. The Megalodon would need very large sea animals in order to survive, which aren't there anymore. The large sea creatures the Megalodon ate have gone extinct along with him.
dace villen
dace villen - 7 years ago
i seen one in the Saginaw River once.
Dennis Day
Dennis Day - 7 years ago
Can anything be older than 6000 years old?
Roberto Vega
Roberto Vega - 7 years ago
we need a army reund water to kill
AYER07 Doesn't Kid
AYER07 Doesn't Kid - 7 years ago
Were Going Down Captain.... lol
tevor johnson
tevor johnson - 7 years ago
This beat goes hard
Mike Marquardt
Mike Marquardt - 7 years ago
far out and groovy starting to write a rap song about it now fast as ashark he a killer he,lll rap out you heart
da'dub
da'dub - 7 years ago
The Japanese are getting in a tuna can
t scooter
t scooter - 7 years ago
Much bigger!
Vicente Fuentes
Vicente Fuentes - 7 years ago
may be....may be....
titi
titi - 7 years ago
megalodon: dun dun dun dun dun dun dun dun

captain: were going to need a bigger boat!!!!

megalodon: ill EAT you for that!!!!!!!!!!

captain: yeah right

megalodon: big asshole

great white: can i join

megalodon and captain: NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

great white: wah wah wah wah

megalodon: cry baby

captain: idiot

great white: im going to stay here

megalodon: after this ill eat you

great white: okay

megalodon: ill eat your boat

captain: WHY!!!!!

megalodon: you forgot

megalodon: im going home
tellus inhabitant
tellus inhabitant - 7 years ago
LONG LIVE MEGALODON!!!!!!
Jaden Pearce
Jaden Pearce - 7 years ago
if that crab trap was 7ft that shark was easily over 30ft which is bigger than great whites I think but that's a lowball I measured the cage at about my knuckle so an inch give or take when I went down the length of the shark it came out to 42ft and it cut off before the tail showed so I think it's the real deal it looks prehistoric as well
alan mcgill
alan mcgill - 7 years ago
Jaden Pearce its not, that video was already proven to be a greenland sleeper shark. its bben confirmed for a couple yeaes now. that cage is not as big as this video suggests
Robert Brunston
Robert Brunston - 7 years ago
Thank you.
Mark Pearson
Mark Pearson - 7 years ago
we know more about space then our oceans. so it doesn't surprise me if there are things like this waiting to be discovered.
Dave Quaschnick
Dave Quaschnick - 7 years ago
chuckle* I don't care if it a billion year old species of shark, a billion year old shark or a "modern" shark that's 40+ feet long. When  predators start getting that big?! It time to explore space and go live on the damn Moon!  ESH.
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
if you want to find out just jump in the ocean, in the middle of nowhere. ????
Sherry Patrick
Sherry Patrick - 7 years ago
I caught one the other night .............................



IN MY DREAMS LOL
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker - 7 years ago
What if I told you that is way to small to be a megalodon?
TheBestYoutubeChannelEverTimesInfinity
TheBestYoutubeChannelEverTimesInfinity - 7 years ago
Oceans are NOT the "blood" of the planet...Magma would be the blood....
Indifferent Centrist
Indifferent Centrist - 7 years ago
Sharks and I have a really good arrangement: I don't go in the ocean and they don't bite me.
Happy Dude 420
Happy Dude 420 - 7 years ago
I think i'll stick to pools.
Peter Schmidt
Peter Schmidt - 7 years ago
I used to see these all the time at the Delaware shore areas..
Naturestan
Naturestan - 7 years ago
Megladon also swims in rivers. Maybe there?
HYPEBEAST gaming
HYPEBEAST gaming - 7 years ago
omg
Ronnie Pierce
Ronnie Pierce - 7 years ago
amazing how nobody ever gets a clear pic of monsters
Gabryjel
Gabryjel - 7 years ago
Welcome to Helsingborg.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Ok, I'll take a look. Thank you . It hard to find people that are grown up and can have an intelligent conversation.
James Jaguar Onca
James Jaguar Onca - 7 years ago
music please
skin41
skin41 - 7 years ago
Megalodons are 59 ft. 18 metres not 50 ft. its been proven
Snow Fox
Snow Fox - 7 years ago
Can Somebody Tells Me Are This Fake OR Real
Elisabeth Begg-Pearce
Elisabeth Begg-Pearce - 7 years ago
Could also be a shark I've seen called a "mega-mouth"
Gregg Smith
Gregg Smith - 7 years ago
You are going to need a bigger boat
Selva 7
Selva 7 - 7 years ago
they exist alright
cheekmeat66
cheekmeat66 - 7 years ago
i can beat a megalodon's ass. easily.
cheekmeat66
cheekmeat66 - 7 years ago
yeah, you're probably right.
Bat Fink
Bat Fink - 7 years ago
cheekmeat66 Dont be silly ..only chuck Norris can do such things, everyone knows that...
DIEGO GARCIA
DIEGO GARCIA - 7 years ago
MICHAEL Del Valle yea we still have fish, some one was lying to you when they told you that there weren't any fish, and they probably weren't a scientist. I don't know when you heard that they said they discovered every animal on the planet. Also a monster can be anything so that part was just downright stupid, so next time think a bout what you are saying before you post.
PGComet
PGComet - 7 years ago
Wouldn't be the first time an extinct species turned out to not be extinct.
ill rotten games
ill rotten games - 7 years ago
PROOF! I knew it..... Wow......
Jeffrey Newman
Jeffrey Newman - 7 years ago
we have no idea what else we could find in the ocean there could be millions of different creatures because we have only discovered about 5 percent out of 100 percent of the earths waters
Billy Coy
Billy Coy - 7 years ago
megalodons aren't real
A7X
A7X - 7 years ago
If megalodons arent real where did all the teeth come from that have been confirmed by world renowned scientist to be megalodon teeth lol
Jami Force
Jami Force - 7 years ago
Supposedly all these sightings of a megoladon and yet nobody has been attacked. Those sharks weren't known to not attack
A7X
A7X - 7 years ago
Well think about it why would a 50+ foot long 10 ton animal waste time eating a 185 lbs human I mean I don't eat the annoying ass flies that land on Ur face on summer nights
SamBob 63
SamBob 63 - 7 years ago
Oh Cool!! Look, it's Bigfoot!!!
Dan Van Hoose
Dan Van Hoose - 7 years ago
damn music ruins it
Jeff Case
Jeff Case - 7 years ago
Basking shark at 3:42. Come on people.
Jmichael Isbell
Jmichael Isbell - 7 years ago
Hard evidence, yeah
Carl PLouis
Carl PLouis - 7 years ago
I don't know about y'all but that beat was sick ;-)
Daniel Mount
Daniel Mount - 7 years ago
This is a whale shark.
hermit dan
hermit dan - 7 years ago
I`m sorry Lord for all the trout I`ve caught in my life! PLZ forgive... Cool vid though...
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
hermit dan But you ate the trout you caught rite yummy
Chris Palffy
Chris Palffy - 7 years ago
Load a rubbish
Chris Palffy
Chris Palffy - 7 years ago
Load a rubbish
Tarquin Farquhar
Tarquin Farquhar - 7 years ago
NOPE
Thomas Velasquez
Thomas Velasquez - 7 years ago
Megalodon are about as real as big Bigfoot
Brent's Boats
Brent's Boats - 7 years ago
+DMCvids hey buddy, just a heads up. You misspelled "of" and "monster", you probably type pretty fast. I was just sayin.
wajang1000
wajang1000 - 7 years ago
Megalodon jackass video.
Robert Ganner
Robert Ganner - 7 years ago
most of the Sharks in this Video are Basking Sharks, now I am not dissing you and I am not disbelieving you, the whole Scientific World believed the Coelocanth was extinct only to be Discovered in the early 50s in the Indian Ocean, so who knows what's down there.
L M
L M - 7 years ago
Actually Coelacanths were thought to have become extinct in the Late Cretaceous, around 66 million years ago, but were rediscovered in 1938 off the coast of South Africa.
So your time is off just a little over 12 years.
Cryptek WolfUK
Cryptek WolfUK - 7 years ago
Nope
Joe Worden
Joe Worden - 7 years ago
Basking shark
hoscarnag
hoscarnag - 7 years ago
Not even a nice try...epic fail. Not one of those sharks were Megas. There are no Megas...they've all gone the way of the Yeti
Chris Gibbs
Chris Gibbs - 7 years ago
There was one in my toilet after burrito night
Jon Nieve
Jon Nieve - 7 years ago
Video chanta, fome y sin asunto.
Millyjack kahn
Millyjack kahn - 7 years ago
No one would want a megladon to be alive more then me, but sadly I don't think so, YEAH there could be giant species of creatures down there but not something from that long ago, something would have come up by now.
SoBelle AKA Southern Belle
SoBelle AKA Southern Belle - 7 years ago
One of the pics is of a Greenland Shark, very distinct features and parasite always over their eyes here is info from wiki

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenland_shark

The Greenland shark is one of the largest living species of shark, with dimensions comparable to those of the great white shark. Greenland sharks grow to 6.4 m (21 ft) and 1,000 kg (2,200 lb),[6] and possibly up to 7.3 m (24 ft) and more than 1,400 kg (3,100 lb).[7][8] Most Greenland sharks observed have been around 2.44–4.8 m (8.0–15.7 ft) long and weigh up to 400 kg (880 lb).

as for the shadows swimming .... oceans are pretty clear and if u notice the ripples are a photoshop effect compare it to an actual shark or any fish swimming it breaks and levels of clarity should be visible ...it's not!
Lee Broadbent
Lee Broadbent - 7 years ago
these are Rich Piana's personal pets that he's pumped full of synthol...
Margaret Heger
Margaret Heger - 7 years ago
yes now leave them alone and anything and everything else that lives beneath us. we were never meant to know the oceans secrets. some things are best left alone.
Bat Fink
Bat Fink - 7 years ago
Margaret Heger Thing is the oceans secrets are now null and void thanks to Fukushima...
Curtis Costello
Curtis Costello - 7 years ago
I agree
mike munro
mike munro - 7 years ago
Yep, more rubbish.
Khubla Khan
Khubla Khan - 7 years ago
yeah that's a Megalodon shark and my ass is on fire I mean basking shark if it's not a whale shark.... there's more chances of a Bigfoot being captured Dead or Alive than a Megalodon which doesn't exist anymore
felix decker
felix decker - 7 years ago
Apparently don't even know what a great white is. Lmfao
Hasib Rayhan
Hasib Rayhan - 7 years ago
that was a orca
Josh Nichol
Josh Nichol - 7 years ago
4:12 thats a greenland shark
Flexb123
Flexb123 - 7 years ago
You can`t really see anything in most of the videos showing those massive sharks. Probably a whale anyway.
Paul Sauntson
Paul Sauntson - 7 years ago
If megalodon was still alive there'd be wales with scars from failed attacks similar to those found on cape fur seals done by great white sharks
mfhmonkey
mfhmonkey - 7 years ago
Liars get a life
jbbolts
jbbolts - 7 years ago
Must have been some really strong tape.....
R Adkins
R Adkins - 7 years ago
MEGLALODON SHARKS ARE REAL.
howard smith
howard smith - 7 years ago
Thats what jaws is. Its not great white
senyum0
senyum0 - 7 years ago
i think we need a bigger boat
Bleb Bleber
Bleb Bleber - 7 years ago
2:37 is a Basking shark.
ネロ
ネロ - 7 years ago
Megalodon liv in warm so when za cold came in Megalodon's food migrated North so tharfir Megalodon daid off
BZH SV
BZH SV - 7 years ago
whale shark don't U know
Liz Carroll
Liz Carroll - 7 years ago
And glad they are gone, otherwise the ocean would be a very dangerous place.
Liz Carroll
Liz Carroll - 7 years ago
Basking shark, six gill shark...
Ty Scott
Ty Scott - 7 years ago
I like that beat
Sean H
Sean H - 7 years ago
farewell and adeiux to you fair spanish ladies!! when that fuckin thing spits out a sign that says Orca,,then I'll buy the dino shark theory!! too many cheezy ass sci-fi shark movies!!!
Jason Woodley
Jason Woodley - 7 years ago
it's a big mouth shark a Plankton eater
patayin mga bakla
patayin mga bakla - 7 years ago
too much eating of junk food will cause hallucinations.
UNHOLY PRIEST
UNHOLY PRIEST - 7 years ago
no megalodon on this video greenland shark and basking shark' a megalodon is 60 ft shark that resembles a great white shark in dorsal fin and snout and colour there isnt any on this video sorry but this person has no clue about sharks
AnOhioPatriot
AnOhioPatriot - 7 years ago
Yea.....So......WHO was conveniently there on a TALLER vessel, to get the photo of the guy standing on his boat, looking at the "shark" to begin with? This is ALWAYS conveniently left out of the "information"....... ALWAYS the animal with a "comparison" for size, but ZERO credits to the "photographer"....Pffffffff........
illumi NOTme
illumi NOTme - 7 years ago
I used to think nothing of kayaking in the ocean but I am getting leary of such activity. sometimes I think the older I get the more of a chicken I am ! Or maybe I'm wiser. I can deal with anything on land but things in the sea are dreadful.
jakewoodstock
jakewoodstock - 7 years ago
That kayak ain't no 14'
MajikkijaM
MajikkijaM - 7 years ago
stupid
Franky's awareness
Franky's awareness - 7 years ago
i have well feed that shark so i can Release the Cracken and watch them fight!
Oliver S. Daniel
Oliver S. Daniel - 7 years ago
Lousy camera in 2017?
Immortal Iconz
Immortal Iconz - 7 years ago
That beat is rockin!
Thebuilderofthings1
Thebuilderofthings1 - 7 years ago
More bogus misrepresentation.
Scott Bowman
Scott Bowman - 7 years ago
What do likes and subscribes actually return? I ask because a like or subscribe isn't going to happen when you post this rubbish
H.B. Entertainment.TM
H.B. Entertainment.TM - 7 years ago
actually megalodon is estimated to be over 60ft not 40ft
Mohamad Davarzani
Mohamad Davarzani - 7 years ago
LAST ONE BESIDE THE CAGE OMG O MY GOD IT WAS NEARLY 38 METERS LONG (AQUAMAN ) NEEDED
Daniel Elison
Daniel Elison - 7 years ago
I'm gonna tell u how big is the megalodon like as big as a Submarine and Great white is not the biggest shark in the world it's megalodon
David Dixon
David Dixon - 7 years ago
Several of the sharks in the deep water sequences are six gill sharks (Hexanchus griseus) which can grow up to between 4 to 6 metres. There are possibly Greenland sharks (Somniosus micocephalus) which can grow up to 7 to 8 metre as well as the broad nose seven gill shark (Nutorynchus copedianus). Some of the large sharks that were close to the surface looked like whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) that can grow up to 12 to 14 metres, but the images were not clear enough to be certain. To be able to identify several of the images shown you would need a DNA sample. In science, until it is proven it doesn't exist. That doesn't mean there are not any unidentified shark species in the oceans, it means until a specimen can be studied and proven to exist these are just hypotheses.
Simião M R
Simião M R - 7 years ago
imagine se as TVs mostrarem que realmente existe os tubarões gigantescos vai acabar com o turismo nas praias do mundo inteiro porque já foram vistos em todo mundo más eles não atacam pessoas eles são muito inteligentes o que mata pessoas é o cabeça chata que mata milhares de pessoas em rios e nos mares do mundo inteiro
Craig Mooring
Craig Mooring - 7 years ago
Not the least bit convincing.
Kenneth Breitling
Kenneth Breitling - 7 years ago
Poor presentation! Video lingers on non-significant matter and skates through significant matter! Seems to me that the music meant more than the presentation!
Angel 666
Angel 666 - 7 years ago
megladons are real man.i caught 1 b4 but no1 believes me.it was 38ft long.
Zaddoff
Zaddoff - 7 years ago
Your mom is a megalodon
Bryan Davis
Bryan Davis - 7 years ago
Looks like a plug for the Megalodon movie coming soon.
Paul Sack
Paul Sack - 7 years ago
How can megalodons exist when jesus loved us all and clearly there were none on noahs ark?
Sven Blackers
Sven Blackers - 7 years ago
Most of this footage shows basking sharks. I'm pretty sure that whale sharks and pacific sleeper sharks feature in this as well.
Megalabollocks more like.
hussein bolt
hussein bolt - 7 years ago
pfffff es ce qu'on l'a vu une seule fois bouger à côté d'un bateau?
Mamud Brambow
Mamud Brambow - 7 years ago
stupid vid
TADionysus
TADionysus - 7 years ago
first one on the beach is a dead basking shark and the second one with the boat is a whale shark you can tell by the dorsal fin in fact every shark in this documentary is not a prehistoric meglodon
DonutsRYummy
DonutsRYummy - 7 years ago
On the beach is a basking shark, all we saw here were mostly basking sharks...
German shepherd Lover
German shepherd Lover - 7 years ago
Looks like Basking sharks and Whale sharks (both huge, the latter reaching 50 ft) both harmless plankton eaters, also a bit of photo shop tossed in. Megalodon pig's arse!
Michael Zimmermann
Michael Zimmermann - 7 years ago
Lmao. Fools.
Edgar Zemite
Edgar Zemite - 7 years ago
Complete rubbish with crappy music in background.
left behind
left behind - 7 years ago
its my pet goldfish i flushed him down the toilet because he out grew his bowl.
Leigh Watts
Leigh Watts - 7 years ago
Megamouth
ElAlexxis
ElAlexxis - 7 years ago
"evidence" on youtube..
Phil Gallier
Phil Gallier - 7 years ago
truquage video
harri hiltunen
harri hiltunen - 7 years ago
bigger than white shark...
Prog X
Prog X - 7 years ago
Idiots !!!!
Francis Ramp
Francis Ramp - 7 years ago
IDK ...But I do know where megaloRUG is.....Look to the new POTUS.....
Chuck Kostrzewa
Chuck Kostrzewa - 7 years ago
The "FIN" has no "wake" to it......B.S.!
white slave owner
white slave owner - 7 years ago
with so much over fishing in our water we are taking there food sorce away hence why where seeing more shark activity closer to shore and the suface.in australia alone the shark attacks doubled in one year.unsure about the rest of the earth but it is a good indicator that something is going on down deep in the oceans.
Sheryl Martin
Sheryl Martin - 7 years ago
Who is the music artist behind this video? I'd like to know the name of jam and artist plz!
thel vadamee
thel vadamee - 7 years ago
5:10 is a sleeper shark
Archangel Lunas
Archangel Lunas - 7 years ago
the one on the beach is real, but the one with it swimming past the boat is clearly Photoshop. 3:41 is a basking shark, doesn't even eat fish, it eats plankton and krill. 4:00 is most likely a great white, megalodon is extremely larger. 5:00 is that Norwegian shark that's rare as fuck (can't remember the name).
tj 1911
tj 1911 - 7 years ago
total bs
thel vadamee
thel vadamee - 7 years ago
2:50 or so its a basking shark
Dayne Varley
Dayne Varley - 7 years ago
It's clearly a whale shark retard!
robert roussett
robert roussett - 7 years ago
photoshop? if this were true, brody would get out of his grumpy grave, hooper would get a bigger boat, quint would join brody with a harpoon and cutter, (took a couple of swigs before) and go after this sob....rr
Christopher Gutierrez
Christopher Gutierrez - 7 years ago
You're stupid
Mark Wiseman
Mark Wiseman - 7 years ago
The best possible Megalodon compilation I have ever seen - and I've been looking for about 3 years. Awesome!
Mike F
Mike F - 7 years ago
Great basking shark footage.....
Bruce Smith
Bruce Smith - 7 years ago
there all whale sharks
Brian VanBuskirk
Brian VanBuskirk - 7 years ago
I caught a Megalodon last week on my son's Mickey Mouse rod.
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
The fishing pole
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
Why you want to buy it
alisia Green
alisia Green - 7 years ago
cool
emin447
emin447 - 7 years ago
samanta karavello
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
Bb02xx you still got that fishing pole
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
+Kevin Ford you still got that fishing pole
Kevin Ford
Kevin Ford - 7 years ago
Brian VanBuskirk oak islad
ForwardSlash
ForwardSlash - 7 years ago
Brian VanBuskirk ,,,, DUDE!!!! Did you catch and release ???? Cause I think I caught that Same Meg in Yaggars pond. Using my old 1960s Fishin' Magician! It works the charm on Megs!
Brown Mark
Brown Mark - 7 years ago
Brian VanBuskirk What strength line were you using? steel or mono leader?

I ask because I caught one too. I'm trying to make sure my world record is safe.
Shawn Snudden
Shawn Snudden - 7 years ago
And I, on my Popiel Pocket Fisherman!
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
Like a dolphin
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
Take a picture of it when you riding it aite
Michael Sierra
Michael Sierra - 7 years ago
Brian VanBuskirk just caught, tamed, and put a saddle on 1. Now i'm going to ride his bitch ass and go find and kick c'thulu's ass.
mark masterson
mark masterson - 7 years ago
haha i just PMSL (pissed meself laughing, just incase u didnt no) hahaha...gud 1 ;-)
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
Brian VanBuskirk That's some shit about that huh
MAXIMUS OSCO
MAXIMUS OSCO - 7 years ago
That's my sick I'm skinny dipping
MAXIMUS OSCO
MAXIMUS OSCO - 7 years ago
dick
I GOT THE GOYA
I GOT THE GOYA - 7 years ago
did you guys make the music? @dmcvids
silver tangent
silver tangent - 7 years ago
its a ginger orca,love red heads
Hsk Hsk
Hsk Hsk - 7 years ago
Slk tromba com um desses na praia é roça
Ernest Schultz
Ernest Schultz - 7 years ago
How do you live with yourself?
Kelly Keys
Kelly Keys - 7 years ago
Whale Shark. . . .
Robin Barnard
Robin Barnard - 7 years ago
looks like a whale shark to me!!
travis kuykendall
travis kuykendall - 7 years ago
the video is cool but the music sucks
Bruce Burns
Bruce Burns - 7 years ago
All doctored films .
Danny Irish Greene
Danny Irish Greene - 7 years ago
MY UNCLE IS A MARINE BIOLOGIST..NO MEGLADONS AROUND UNLESS THEY ARE IN THE 95% OF THE OCEAN WE HVNT SEEN
FOOD FIGHTER
FOOD FIGHTER - 7 years ago
huge submarine ;)
Brent Nicol
Brent Nicol - 7 years ago
So that is where my goldfish disappeared to. Megalodon was his name.
crypto investments
crypto investments - 7 years ago
Utopian music
michael mixon
michael mixon - 7 years ago
Looks like a basking shark. They grow very large.
Beryl Zaidan
Beryl Zaidan - 7 years ago
agree
Ben Vis
Ben Vis - 7 years ago
argg!!,.. the editing sucks. please show entire clips beginning to end instead of trying to make it look 'edgy' by inserting flashing static shots and jumping around a bunch cutting clips short... lame.
TotalMishap
TotalMishap - 7 years ago
It was a 50ft baked potato.
vxenon67
vxenon67 - 7 years ago
You can capture, tame and ride a Megaladon shark in the video game Ark Survivor Evolved. :P
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
vxenon67 grand theft auto five
Alaskan Fisherman
Alaskan Fisherman - 7 years ago
kiss it and us all goodbye. Fukushima!!!!
Denounce Rush
Denounce Rush - 7 years ago
Where's Quint when you need him?
Nick Wong
Nick Wong - 7 years ago
Ping Floyd He's great white shark shit at the bottom of the ocean.
Lynette Dundon
Lynette Dundon - 7 years ago
A couple of those look like Greenland sharks to me.
ian cruz
ian cruz - 7 years ago
just edited haha
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Megalodon are very real, but if you believe in EVIL SOLUTIONS - or evolution - this might sound crazy. What is crazy, is that I need to have more faith that evolution is actually true specially when 150 gone by and no SOLID Proof - 90 of old bones are false and you do not see then anymore in the Smithsonian - NEBRASKA MAN FALSE , PILTMAN FALSE, NEAN.. MAN FALSE --- Out of millions and millions of fossil someone please show me at least one that proofs evolution... 150 and still waiting ...
John a
John a - 7 years ago
bisquitnspanky wow you're just as bad as the guy who doesn't believe in evolution. youre ignoring evidence like he is. no credible historian says jesus never lived. there is no source of the time or after that denies his existence. even Jewish and roman writing doesn't dispute that.

bishop polycarp who lived from 69 ad to 155 ad was a student of John the apostle who as you know was a disciple of jesus. polycarp's letter to the pillipians can be read online.

Ignatius of Antioch's who was a bishop and friends with polycarp wrote letters that can be read on the internet.
pritnice
pritnice - 7 years ago
Bible is about a story. It´s value is in a story and moral guidelines. But anything more would be too much as an scholl enviroment wich, i belive, should base on things we know to be true as in our best knowledge.
Evolution, as i said earlier, is not a theory anymore. it has weaknesses of course, but it will add up piece by piece, things will be proven, other assumpitons will be folded. That is the way of any science.. that is the way we know what we know about the world. Science evolvs due errors and mistakes, and therefor we konw things better every day.

Evolution is not a lie. it is inperfect consept of understanding our selves but it will improve every day. Religions.. well, they do not. Religions stop thinking, questoning and just about anything that make us wiser by the time. For example, with just religion, we would not have this conversation right now. Propaby we wouldn´t exist anymore as humans in this planet.
Maybe Science is kind of religon too. At least for us whom are not scientists. I can´t prove you anything i´ve said in this.. neiher can´t you :D
pritnice
pritnice - 7 years ago
Evolution theory was plain theory when it was invented by Mr. Darwin at 1859. In that point there was no means to prove it anything but obervations.
Since science has (yes, it has) evolved through the time, it has been able to proof 80% of the idea of original theory right.
In specific details, Darwin was wrong by many times about what he presented on "Origin of Speicies", Due the lack of means to prove them, but basic line was all correct, Evolution.
There for we call it today as Evolution with out that "theory" adding.

Allthou, there is some things that cannot be proven by science yet and on that part it has still lot of things to do. Science goes ahead and everyone will benefit results, and even you who do believe in bible and christian God.. or any other God.
Secret of life on earth will be revealled, not depressed.. wich is basicly job for a religions... people who search for knowledge are dangerous for those in power.

Talking about Father of lies.. have you ever thought what is biggest lie of all in this kind conversations all together?
It is a consept of Religions.
What is more to deviding people in this world than different religions?
And anyone wants to be right that this MY way and MY rites of believing is right, not yours. And everyone will swear on their holy book.. who is right?
other way around... what would be better way for devide and destruct people of god, than put different opinions out, how to worship God..

Religions, all of them, are from the down below. They devide us to believe that there is right way of believing. But god speaks in every book same way:
Fuck the rites, believe.. that´s it.

And back.. nowhere has said ever that evolution and bible has conflicted to each other. Nowhere. It is just interperation for a people who do not want, will or can´t see message out of words..
Maybe.. just maybe God created this world and all the spieces by Evolution..? Ever thought of that?
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Thank you for your response. The Bible can not be taught in school due to Evolutionary lies 50 to 70 years ago that have been proven false. Who is the father of all lies ?? Is it not that Evolution is a religion as well ??
pritnice
pritnice - 7 years ago
Yep. Evolution is a theory. Best theory there is for explaining speicies on earth today.
Opponent, Religion, is not even a theory. It is a fairytale someone invetend coulple of thousad years ago and it´s belived (Faith = Beliving something exist without anything to back it up) to be true. No facts either to prove it.
Besides, Sir.. You are not worthy enough to put Hell-sentence on me or any other.. it is not your or any humans post in this world. Read your bible and ask god if you not believe when I´m saying it.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
can he have children, that is sad - Evolution is a lie -
who's your daddy
who's your daddy - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison didn't Bruce Jenner evolve into kaitlyn?
Paul Simonson
Paul Simonson - 7 years ago
bull pucky!
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Give one Fact of evolution that is Scientific ??? Can it be tested ?? ...they keep taking down the fossils.. WHY , DNA real science..
Paulo Filho
Paulo Filho - 7 years ago
+zarria blitsy Why u atheists think u r smarter than everyone else? When u r the dumbest people on earth!?
zarria blitsy
zarria blitsy - 7 years ago
Markus Rock maby becuse it take 100s of thousands of years u dumbass!
zarria blitsy
zarria blitsy - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison wait wait.. your saying we'r idiots for believing in evolution saying theres no proof but u believe in god lol.....! wow your one crazy nut job..!
Daniel Tate
Daniel Tate - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison The very fact that you and creatards like you, think that a theory in science (a Scientific theory) means a guess, shows how scientifically illiterate you are. Perhaps you should actually learn some science before you try discrediting any of it. And even if evolution was shown to be completely wrong or false, that in no way proves creation by your god. You would still have to prove your god exists and created the universe and life.
DIEGO GARCIA
DIEGO GARCIA - 7 years ago
Why you implie that someone is going to hell, when God could have engineered life to evolve into the perfect species humans over time? Like I said in the previous statement
DIEGO GARCIA
DIEGO GARCIA - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison you can look at the genetic structure of almost any animal, and it will have the same sequences as human genetics. So... Argue away from that.
DIEGO GARCIA
DIEGO GARCIA - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison okay monkeys and humans share 99% of genes with monkeys, don't you feel stupid now?
Charles E George
Charles E George - 7 years ago
Retard... Also nice one Yoni
J-P Salminen
J-P Salminen - 7 years ago
You tell us to give you facts while you self BELIVEVE uncnditionally 2000 yr old fairytale. Or.. if not, prove me that your God exists. w. Hard, cold facts, no "need to believe to know" nonsense.
Todd Hageman
Todd Hageman - 7 years ago
Thousands of pieces of proof of the theory of evolution are on public display in the universities and museums of every country on earth. The word "theory" means "explanation of", NOT conjecture or hypothesis. What there is no proof (as opposed to myths and stories), none whatsoever of, is actually creationism. Hide you head in the sand, ignore reality and fact, invent your own meanings for things and attach significance to myth and legend at your own great peril.
Todd Hageman
Todd Hageman - 7 years ago
Scientific explanations are called "Theories" -- like the theory of gravity, electromagnetic theory, etc. It most definitely does not mean the same thing as "conjecture" or "hypothesis." The theory of evolution is a scientific fact and has been recognized as such by educated and intelligent people across the world since the early 1800's. FYI - BEFORE Charles Darwin.
Todd Hageman
Todd Hageman - 7 years ago
Apparently you have never actually been to the Smithsonian Institution, because there are literally HUNDREDS of prehistoric human remains on display there, and have been for decades. Evolution is a fact Mr. Mathison, with countless pieces of evidence proving it. What actually has never been proven as fact in any way, shape or form, is creationism.
Paulo Filho
Paulo Filho - 7 years ago
+Kenneth Mathison Right! All we can to do is pray for them! God bless u!
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Thank you Paulo, we just present the evidence an place it Gods hand.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
On the contrary, I believe in try science ( true science ) the the 2 Law of thermodynamic, the law of Mathematical Probability and I can mention 5 more science laws disproving evolution . Millions of fossil in the fossil records with different species, plants vertebrate and NOT ONE transitional species. For 70 years Piltman was a missing link a DNA test prove to be a lie. I believe in science, just not the one that has no proof and cannot be verified and tested in a lab.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Evolution is we evolved from a single cell and not created by God.
The Cambrian Explosion is in the fossil record .Everything came to life fully form into their own species. Even Darwin could not explained that.
Paulo Filho
Paulo Filho - 7 years ago
+Kenneth Mathison Don't waste your time bro! Atheists r the dumbest people on earth. U r not gonna convince them that there's a creator! They wanna be different, they wanna have a 15 min of fame!
Kosmos de Kosmopoliet
Kosmos de Kosmopoliet - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison doesn't believe in science; he prefers to base his worldview on the scriptures written by some bronze age jewish death cult 2000 years ago, worshipping a warlike skygod that demands animal sacrifices daily, and the cutting of the tips of man's penises, cuz that's god. fuck science, amirite? Let´s mutilate some babies dicks
Andrew Downer
Andrew Downer - 7 years ago
+Paulo Filho either your being sarcastic or don't understand evolution
Paulo Filho
Paulo Filho - 7 years ago
Lol! Right! Last time i checked, a monkey still a monkey!
Mike Anderson
Mike Anderson - 7 years ago
Yoni Bismuth The biggest mass murderers in history were atheistic. Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot. Do your research before you post such ignorance.
Andrew Downer
Andrew Downer - 7 years ago
wisdom teeth and human canine teeth my help you with that . also people being born with no Sharpe canines in Japan . also chickens being born with teeth.......
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
You are right about the Gold - please look at MONOTONIC Gold and what is use for. It makes our body into a super conductors and the Elite use it to prolong life. David R is 102 and Roth 105 . Queen of E is 94
Sixfoot Ben
Sixfoot Ben - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison I use to believe in evolution and I stil do when it comes to every other life form on earth. But I can't get past the missing link in our evolution . I think we were created. And not by God but by another civilization . I think we were made to gather gold and other precious materials. Why do we love goldso much? We gather it and store it all in one place . Human beings are so unconditioned to live on earth. We have TV shows called naked and afraid . Why is living on our own planet for 30 days such an amazing accomplishment ? Because it's really hard to make fire from sticks and vines and we can't drink water unless we boil it. We have no fur so we get cold very easily. I watch a lot of science based programs and the other day I was watching one about horrible birth defects like spina bifida which kills people before sexual maturity. And there are many others genetic mutations that should not have made it in our DNA for this long. I'm agnostic so my religion is "I Don't Know" so I can't say I'm positive about anything. But the idea that a civilization created us with some of their DNA and some Chimpanzee DNA and didn't really do a great job but good enough to get the job done. Think about it. We are so fucked if the power goes out. Most of the Human population can hardly handle spending one night in their own backyard let alone live for any extended time outdoors. No fur, cant drink the water or eat most meat without fire and can't fake a shit without a toilet. I do think that if your in good shape and eat a prober diet you could probably shit outside and have minimal wiping. But I think it's more probable that most of us would be pretty miserable if the power went out and we had actually live off the land. A bunch of skinny ass creatures with creamy itchy asses is what I think would happen. All civilizations have stories of sky people in their history. And the megladon? I wouldn't be surprised if we found crazier things than that in our oceans. I think it's not to crazy to believe there could be other intelligent civilizations under Antarctica . But your guess is as good as mine. Just be nice to each other .
DIEGO GARCIA
DIEGO GARCIA - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison maybe the different species of humans is a good indication. You have nothing to disprove evolution, and yet your saying it is false because they have some false proof. Now tell me how does that make any sense, in a rational argument, both sides need to support their side with evidence and you didn't do that at all. You may as well be some dumb motherfucking flat earther who goes against any logic making evidence from nowhere, and completely going against well documented evidence the earth is a globe. Back to latter, they can trace back genetic material in humans, to almost any other animal on earth, including birds, and reptiles. If you don't believe me google it and find any website that has .gov or .org, with .org being less reliable, but usually supported with links to .gov websites. Then you can argue with scientists as much as you want, and change nothing because they know more than you. Also many of the same bone groups are found in animals that humans have, further proving evolution. I personally believed that God created the universe and everything in it, and engineered it so perfectly, that once upon a time on a planet later to be named earth by the sentient beings that would later inhabit it, life evolved from the elements that were present, because God engineered the universe to play out like this. Modern science is the study of the natural world, the word God created, he calculated exactly where every particle would be so it created life. With this point of view, science isn't evil and religion can go side by side un conflicted. If science was evil and given to us by satan so we destroy ourselves, why are humans the ones inventing the technology to solve problems? The more we study life, the more we learn it all operates like a machine, meaning it had to have been designed by some Devine being. That doesn't disprove evolution though, especially if the word is how I described it previously. The only problem I have is with the religion, is there is so much that is put in, that God didn't originally intend to give us. I've studied with multiple different versions of the Cristian bible including the KJV, idk if you are religious but I assume you are based of you stance in the previous conversation. In the bible it says "whosoever believeth in him shall not perish, but have everlasting life" not "whosoever is saved, baptized, gives tithes, goes to church, doesn't swear, constantly asks for forgiveness, makes the church happy, doesn't drink, doesn't do anything that upsets the pastor, shall have everlasting life" that is my problem with religion. Just the fact that you can get kicked out of a church, and they will tell you that your going to hell, shows how corrupt church can be. If you have read this far, I hope you can see where I'm coming from, it's God who judges whether you believe in him, who lets you into heaven, not man who makes that decision.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Not really, but thank you for being an adult.
Bob3D2000
Bob3D2000 - 7 years ago
+Kenneth Mathison "There is no evidence for evolution." It's a long time since I've seen someone make a statement that is so utterly, factually, objectively and empirically incorrect.

Are you not embarrassed by yourself? You should be.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
There is no evidence for evolution , They even change what science means today to fit your demonic world view. You need more information to become better. 2007 word does not become 2010 without a CREATOR placing more information into the program. were are you getting that information again?? The 2 law thermodynamic - Mathematical and law of Entropy just destroys the evolution.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Evidences What ! , who has the proof, what book. in real life I am 6' 4' ex Marine and it easy to say anything and use bad world when you know you are wrong. You are some punk kid that never learn how to be an adult.
Ove Toranger
Ove Toranger - 7 years ago
+Kenneth Mathison Perhaps this will make things a bit more clear for you regarding the difference of the way you use the word "theory" and the way science does. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory - perhaps, just perhaps it will teach you something useful.
Bob3D2000
Bob3D2000 - 7 years ago
Yet another moron who doesn't understand that the word 'theory' has a different meaning in scientific nomenclature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

http://oregonstate.edu/instruction/bb317/scientifictheories.html
Casper Ghost
Casper Ghost - 7 years ago
get off your arse and go to a museum. nit.
Nige W
Nige W - 7 years ago
You...are an idiot. There is a mountain of evidence. There is far more evidence proving the fact of evolution than any other scientific subject. There is more evidence supporting evolution than there is supporting gravity...yet gravity is a fact, or do you believe invisible angels hold us down to the ground.

Evidence from over a dozen different, independent,scientific disciplines all support the theory of evolution. Biology, Microbiology, Paleontology, DNA, Zoology, just to name a few. 1000s of transitional fossils have been discovered that almost entire lineages of various animals have been documented. Just research the evolution of the whale from a terrestrial animal to its current forms. Long extinct animals like Pakicetus, Ambulocetus, Kutchicetus, Rodhocetus, and Durudon all indicate the gradual evolution of the whale from its prehistoric ancestors towards what they are today. Whales still have hind legs; very small and useless, a throwback to the days when its ancestors walked on land.

Sorry. There is an interesting statistic that 100% of people who deny the mountains of evidence supporting a well understood fact like evolution, are idiots.
Nate Jones
Nate Jones - 7 years ago
Markus Rock was about to comment the same thing but glad you already beat me to it. right on the truth brother
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
You looked a lot better when you were a monkey. You were smarter too.
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
Hi fucktard!!! You need to keep up with the real world!!!! There is a mountain of fossil evidence of early humans. I tried to believe really hard that there was none, but the fossils didn't go away!!! Do you idiots ever read ANYTHING besides propaganda handed to you by the same guys who ask you for money every Sunday? Where's your proof that Jesus ever lived? 2,000 years gone by and not one tiny speck of evidence. Sad.
Verdunveteran
Verdunveteran - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison: Believe what ever you want, dumbass, but two German Type IID U-boot', sure as hell did not have the range to get anywhere even remotely close to neither Cape Town nor any other point along the South African coast! So that part of this little video is fake! And so is most likely the rest of it to! Only ignorant fools like you falls for crap like this!
Markus Rock
Markus Rock - 7 years ago
Evolution, lmao. Why is my Monkey not evolved yet? Damn it!
Flat Earth Rules!
Yoni Bismuth
Yoni Bismuth - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison Evolutionism creates no terrorists, but the blind faith in creationism does and did for centuries
I Am
I Am - 7 years ago
EnigmaEightEighty8 if you believe that nonsense, then I have a bridge to sell you in brooklin.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Their are miracles everyday. You just need to open your eyes. Evolution or Giants is not about religion. The real fact is, no Creator - man is just a monkey doing what ever it want with no accountability or Grace. The Bibles put it this way in GENESIS -- YOU TOO CAN BE AS GODS !! Sound familiar - meet the new boss, same as the old boss ... the lie keeps going ..
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
Sir that is why is still call a THEORY for 150 years THEORY "BEST GUESS " Evolution was science, it would not be call a THEORY of Evolution . LUCY DNA tested - 100 percent MONKEY - Blacker, I don't get my facts from U tube . So were can I get a picture of a fossil or bone that proves Evolution ?? You serve the father of lies, and you not believing, does change the temperature of HELL .
Sven Blackers
Sven Blackers - 7 years ago
It's been proved many times. There are bones, fossils, cave paintings etc etc that prove evolution of the species. In fact, birds have recently been reclassified as living dinosaurs. Humans are one chromosome away from being a monkey. Evolution of species is a proven scientific fact, unlike the existence of God.
EnigmaEightEighty8
EnigmaEightEighty8 - 7 years ago
freeyourmindtc <=== NO. You're the idiot, and far too stupid 2 know how stupid u r...
EnigmaEightEighty8
EnigmaEightEighty8 - 7 years ago
Kenneth Mathison <=== Agree completely. U have 2 be an idiot/imbecile to believe the "THEORY" of Evolution, when there is STILL no proof, and godless morons eat it hook, line, & sucker, because they don't read the Bible, to their peril...
freeyourmindtc
freeyourmindtc - 7 years ago
hahahahahahahahaha, what an idiot.
Kenneth Mathison
Kenneth Mathison - 7 years ago
In plan English , Evolution is all fantasy - and megalodon still around just like Giants squids and other fish like The coelacanth was long considered a "living fossil" - It was extinct 55 years ago then they found one 8 years ago in Japan Tsunami 2009 -
TotalMishap
TotalMishap - 7 years ago
What? Your comment makes no sense you dork..
Jack Greenlee
Jack Greenlee - 7 years ago
Raizzor Kings: Obviously you weren't paying attention, they're not trying to play the whale off as a shark, but rather, are trying to imply that something bit the whale practically in half. And since it is a whale, therefore whatever bit it in half, must be much larger than the whale was. But I'm fairly certain, that some ship propellers are large enough to have cut the whale in half, if it happened to have gotten too close to it.
spiffdaddy
spiffdaddy - 7 years ago
how in the hell have we only seen these big sharks/fish last few years ...maby the deep sea is changing or acting up pulling big .fish type creatures to top of the ocean ??? has any 1 but me been thinking wtf is going on here ??? or maby the world has been adding
 things in secret....
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
They are finding fish that's are not suppose to be in saltwater like a piranha
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
spiffdaddy I agree, something is changing that has the animal kingdom acting strange....... I totally agree bro
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
spiffdaddy I caught two bucket of nemo
Adrian McNaughton
Adrian McNaughton - 7 years ago
All types of known shark
trachodon
trachodon - 7 years ago
lots of BASKING SHARK footage- pointed snout, parasites, coldwater crab traps!
Patrick Germond
Patrick Germond - 7 years ago
I wish we could get a video of great Bigfoot footage like these videos of the shark.
Andrew Lambert
Andrew Lambert - 7 years ago
and did you see the mermaid riding it
kenneth caloun
kenneth caloun - 7 years ago
NICE VIDEO THANKS FRIEND
M5Cookie
M5Cookie - 7 years ago
Between Whale sharks, Basking sharks and what looked like a Greenland shark lurking round the Crab pot.....FFS.. do they think we're dense or something. Megalodon does not exist today, sorry if that's just burst a lot of peoples bubbles..but they don't...FACT.
sandrine HUSS
sandrine HUSS - 7 years ago
requin pèlerin car il nage tranquil A la surface
Doodle biscuit
Doodle biscuit - 7 years ago
NO! I would die on the spot of a heart attack. No nononono
Meandhiminmyhead
Meandhiminmyhead - 7 years ago
the one attacking the big crab pot looked allmost convincing "allmost".
Don RedLeaf
Don RedLeaf - 7 years ago
Video of the beached shark and swimming shark are basking sharks the other one is a Greenland shark, both get very very large in the 20'-25' range easily but are pretty harmless to humans. Heck we are finding new whale species that we never knew about and of course the ceilocanth which man said had been extinct for millions of years!! We don't know anything really about this planet, who can honestly say there are no megalodons swimming our oceans???
Silent Gamer
Silent Gamer - 7 years ago
Echo Zulu plus megalodon would have bin right at the deepest part of the ocean
Silent Gamer
Silent Gamer - 7 years ago
Nah trust me they weren't one was that shark that stays really deep I think
ROBERT SMITH
ROBERT SMITH - 7 years ago
+Austin Allen then it's not a megladon anymore I guess
Austin Allen
Austin Allen - 7 years ago
what if the megladon evolved into the basking shark or the Greenland shark over millions of years...idk just a thought from a stoner lmao
Seventh Sign Soldier
Seventh Sign Soldier - 7 years ago
Any shark with teeth is capable of biting the whale and basking dont have teeth they just suck in plankton like a vacuum , there have been reports of aggressive greenland and salmon sharks not many as humans dont come into contact with greenland and salmons often because where they are located but I wouldnt trust any of the sharks with teeth
ROBERT SMITH
ROBERT SMITH - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf basking sharks are definitely harmless not so sure about the Greenland shark they just don't come in contact with humans very often
chad hiller
chad hiller - 7 years ago
Ty
Miguel CS
Miguel CS - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf the oceans doesnt belong to.humans.
Seventh Sign Soldier
Seventh Sign Soldier - 7 years ago
The last shark shown is one of the biggest Tiger Sharks ive ever seen but was a tiger not megladon and agree the others were basking whales
Tyler Tomlinson
Tyler Tomlinson - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf
Justin Deboer
Justin Deboer - 7 years ago
Kosmos de Kosmopoliet are you talking about Bob?
Roger Griffith
Roger Griffith - 7 years ago
Eggs. Now
curriegc
curriegc - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf your correct. the ones swimming especially near the kayaker is so clearly a basking shark
Mark Vann
Mark Vann - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf I'm a Neanderthal
Arthur Mansor
Arthur Mansor - 7 years ago
shark
Herbin' Avenger
Herbin' Avenger - 7 years ago
Actually those "new" whale species were known about, yet they had not been scientifically identified. Advances in DNA research have helped scientists identify five new cetaceans in the past 15 years, two were dolphins and most were simple category splits between fairly similar species. The "new" species of Beaked whale was known about by Japanese whalers. It is fascinating that there is much to be discovered in our oceans, especially in the depths. As for a living Megalodon Shark, possible but highly unlikely. Hundreds of shark species have gone extinct... Some of them very bizarre in form and function.
Birkbecks
Birkbecks - 7 years ago
agreed  think there were a couple of shots of a whale shark as well :)
sovcast
sovcast - 7 years ago
100% Greenland Shark and Basking Shark was my conclusion as well.
hallamittuna
hallamittuna - 7 years ago
I'm a neanderthalensis.. but no one believes me, even if I have a bunch of veeery lo-res pics of myself.
Life Is Gay
Life Is Gay - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf The only Megalodons that you can see is my D**k! lol. just playing everyone.

Don you are so right, and hell no one really knows shit about earth. like you said stuff is being found everyday.
Ian Farr-Wharton
Ian Farr-Wharton - 7 years ago
Your right, and 2:03 is a gray sharpnose shark, it only gets to 70cm.In the video it looks big by the way it was filmed.. You can tell by the fin and the pointed head, oh and the colour..lol
Dejuan Barnett
Dejuan Barnett - 7 years ago
if it was a super predator like the megaladon swimming the oceans we would know. somethings can't stay hidden
sinemacula1964
sinemacula1964 - 7 years ago
Don there's a 6 gill shark in there as well m8, bottom feeder and can get up to 6m in length.
Ben S
Ben S - 7 years ago
Gary Daniel Because they're fucking massive
Thomas Quinn
Thomas Quinn - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf me there extinct something that size would be seen
Joe Smith
Joe Smith - 7 years ago
Thanks for posting that Don. I was going to do the same. You saved me the effort. what a bunch of click bate.
J Browning
J Browning - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf The Coelacanth was rediscovered in the 30's and are deep pelagic species. Sturgeon and gar are also very evolved ancient species but are less sensitive than the coelacanth. Waiting for the day for Nessy (Plethyosaurus) to become known.
dlholmes111
dlholmes111 - 7 years ago
About ten years ago a huge shark tooth was found at the mouth of the Amazon River. The tooth was determined to be a Megalodon tooth, but didnt look like a very old fossil. A carbon date found the tooth was only a few thousand years old, but didnt look that old to me. But even if it was a few thousand years old, it must debunk the theory that the megalodon went extinct millions of years ago, and must still be here.
Tec Wildstyle
Tec Wildstyle - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf ty for information,these idiots W/ conspiracy theories and a good computer,half the shit on utube is Photoshop
Verdurous Gamer
Verdurous Gamer - 7 years ago
me too, he seems nice though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Valuev
Corey Parks
Corey Parks - 7 years ago
Basking Sharks have been known to grow more than 40ft
J-P Salminen
J-P Salminen - 7 years ago
No, we can´t say anything such as for certain... But it´s unlikely (as 1/ 100 000 000 or so) to have one for numbers of biological reasons. This is however too short slot to explain it, but keywords are sustainable amount of sharks for a spiece, foodsupply.. etc.
It would be wonderful if such creature still exists, but I rather go for to win a lottery.. Better chance in that :)
Duncan Disorderly
Duncan Disorderly - 7 years ago
+Gary Daniel I knew a Spider-Man. A Spider-Man. That dude could do whatever a man can. He couldn't do what a spider can, that would be impossible, as well as silly. It's possible for him to think he was part spider, but then he'd have mental health issues.
Robert Testino
Robert Testino - 7 years ago
well since they fed on whales dont you think we would be finding quite a few whale carcases with massive bites taken out of them?
Kosmos de Kosmopoliet
Kosmos de Kosmopoliet - 7 years ago
I have a Neanderthal friend who rides a velociraptor to work every day
trha2222
trha2222 - 7 years ago
Well, I can honestly say there are no megalodons swimming the oceans. With their size and nutritional requirements they would be far from shy and likely frequent coastlines. We would have seen one by now.
Gary Daniel
Gary Daniel - 7 years ago
Don RedLeaf
I know a few Neanderthals.
Brian Volek
Brian Volek - 7 years ago
no one knows what's in the ocean. who the fuck goes out there. a handful of people who just scratch the surface? no there's more to be found for sure maybe a couple megs
Knapweed
Knapweed - 7 years ago
Over four hundred species of shark were such efficient killers and survivors that they are still around today. Megalodon wasn't one of them despite his very large teeth.

The sperm whale, albeit a mammal, is bigger, a very efficient killer and has even been known to sink ships back in the day. Herman Melville wrote a book about it although the name was changed to 'protect the innocent'. Perhaps, being one of the smartest creatures on the planet had something to do with it. Similarly, a pod of transient Orcas would rip the living shit out of a Megalodon, just like they do with Great White Sharks.
Steve S
Steve S - 7 years ago
Megalodon Sharks aren't like Bigfoot lol. They did exist at one point and there are a lot of "dinosaurs" that still exist in the ocean today.
Steve S
Steve S - 7 years ago
Thomas Quinn Don't ask the internet look it up b.
Steve S
Steve S - 7 years ago
Tella Mosis That's why it's in quotation... I didn't feel like lookin it up.
Bert M
Bert M - 7 years ago
+Bee Kendricks my pleasure
Bert M
Bert M - 7 years ago
Ever heard of gigantalopithicus. ..look it up.
Dimos Rizios
Dimos Rizios - 7 years ago
Steve S you stupid
Bert M
Bert M - 7 years ago
Steve S ..why can't Bigfoot exist if the Megalodon can?
Chasingwaves
Chasingwaves - 7 years ago
Steve S what you talking about I've seen Big foot walking around in my back yard , oohhhh wait........... that's the neighbors wife .
Sam Anderson
Sam Anderson - 7 years ago
Steve S no they don't
Thomas Quinn
Thomas Quinn - 7 years ago
Steve S what sort of dinosaur is alive today?
Daniel Tate
Daniel Tate - 7 years ago
Steve S There are no "dinosaurs" in the ocean. Even during the time of dinosaurs there were not dinosaurs in the ocean. And sharks are not dinosaurs. Even megalodon was not a dinosaur.
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Steve S agreed no need for an all day affair. but to be clear, Sasquatch was the name given to the gigantopythicus from the native Americans...... just saying bro....#Knowledge
Steve S
Steve S - 7 years ago
+Bee Kendricks I'm not gonna argue all day here. I can say they are separate species because Bigfoot is called a Sasquatch not the gigantopithecus. And just because it can't be disproven doesn't mean it is proven. Like the Sasquatch has not been as of yet unlike a megaladon. Which is my main point. As for the protection by law thing all that means is enough ppl thought is was a good idea. People also thought putting trump in office was a good idea look where that's going.
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Steve S Different species???? How can it be different if it never existed? See you just proved my point. They don't exist, yet they are protected by law. They didn't exist yet you are comparing it to "another species" .......you don't see dragons protected by law because they don't exist, but Bigfoot is and has been protected by FEDERAL LAW....... why would that be?
Steve S
Steve S - 7 years ago
+bee Kendricks I can't see comments probly blocked by channel... lol. I literally looked it up before I commented there are no confirmed Bigfoot bones. As for the gigantopithecus it is a separate species. That's like digging up a Neanderthals and calling them homosapiens.
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Steve S By saying it DID at one point exist, what are you implying? That Bigfoot never did? See, I hate when ignorant people jump into a debate they know absolutely nothing about. Look up gigantopythicus. Gigantopythicus lived (according to science) along side dinosaurs. He was 8-11ft tall, completely covered in hair. Education is powerful if utilized correctly. Before jumping into a debate, arm yourself with actual knowledge, this way you won't look stupid with comments like that.
Steve S
Steve S - 7 years ago
Are you crazy lmao. There is no proven Bigfoot bones ANYWHERE. Neanderthal yes, Bigfoot no. Neanderthal living in 2017. Still not a "Bigfoot" I would call that a native.
Jerk
Jerk - 7 years ago
technically they are not 'dinosaurs' there are plenty of prehistoric species still on earth but none of them are 'sauropods' and so not 'dinosaurs'
Nobodyknows808
Nobodyknows808 - 7 years ago
Steve S so did Bigfoot. They existed as well with other hominids.
trha2222
trha2222 - 7 years ago
Dinosaurs? You mean like Nancy Pelosi?
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
True, but zero real evidence of living megalodon. Zero. YT videos don't count.
Etienne Uys
Etienne Uys - 7 years ago
Totally BS.
Maj Khan
Maj Khan - 7 years ago
name of the beat anyone?
william jones
william jones - 7 years ago
they have proved that it did exist a long time ago just look at the teeth they found you can buy them online
and we don't even really know what the hell is in the ocean so much more to explore we haven't even tried to scratch the surface when it comes to the ocean it's so big
KC Gunz
KC Gunz - 7 years ago
lol
ken shebansky
ken shebansky - 7 years ago
this video is old
Eddie Jackley
Eddie Jackley - 7 years ago
I believe the Megladon is still out there I means a logical point. We have researched more on the land 80% out of 5% in the water. and the vast moturity of it is we have a whole ton of searching to do u for a fact believe that biggest shark is alive. why we can't see it ? maybe we aren't looking at the right spots. my wish would be to go on a voyage and research and help anyone who would want to. I do very well see that shark swimming right now and we are wondering oh is he fake or is he real .... stop being delusional we have a mass wide open ocean out there and your going to say it doesn't exist. let's me logical and see the picture picture. #MegalodonDoExist
Joe Lozano
Joe Lozano - 7 years ago
people really should have a clue of what they are posting. lots of these live shots are basking sharks. the deep water shots are sleeper sharks. only one i couldn't explain is the deep water shot where the sharks pectoral fins glide by. too fast to be a sleeper shark and too deep to be a basking shark. basking sharks skim the top f
of the water for krill.
Bristow Quentin
Bristow Quentin - 7 years ago
photo shop
Azren Hodzic
Azren Hodzic - 7 years ago
Hell nah Im done swiming in the ocean
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
I'm still going to be swimming in the ocean floor, cause I loved what I do, but if I see one maybe I can't get away
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
Azren Hodzic have you seen the giant squid yet and they eat sperm whales
Azren Hodzic
Azren Hodzic - 7 years ago
Sure they do, but think what kind of huge predators that lurks in the ocean people have just discovered 5% of all the ocean :)
DIEGO GARCIA
DIEGO GARCIA - 7 years ago
nicksfix8609 we mostly just eat them not the other way around, we are the apex predator on this planet because of our intelligence and insatiable hunger. If there were statistic you'd probably be more likely to get in a car accident that to be eaten by a shark, even if you only drove once, and swam in the oceans hundreds of times.
Phaimany Douan
Phaimany Douan - 7 years ago
Azren Hodzic they love's people who are swimming in the ocean
nicksfix8609
nicksfix8609 - 7 years ago
never would have anyway getting eaten alive is only one worry in that soup of mass danger
mcsc4ever
mcsc4ever - 7 years ago
Nope sorry folks basking sharks only, or very large great whites, but no megalodon sharks
Richard Nash
Richard Nash - 7 years ago
Amazing how a 'documentary' can be produced with ENTIRELY incorrect 'Facts'.
Basking Sharks are great fun to snorkel with an about as dangerous as a wet fart !
rejecter 01
rejecter 01 - 7 years ago
If you search around a bit on the net you will find that all of these have been debunked. For instance the shark washing up on the beach at the start was a basking shark.and the one where the people are hanging over the side and you see some thing slide by, that was a whale shark. Saying megalodon is still around now is like saying that big foot is definitely real with out ever actually seeing one at all.
Gray G
Gray G - 7 years ago
most of these are just whalesharks
Darren Sculuca
Darren Sculuca - 7 years ago
lots of lyes in this vid..basking sharks..newfundland sharks..whale sharks..not educational at all..what a waste.
Brian Deluca
Brian Deluca - 7 years ago
Mage mouth I believe is the name of the shark.
Ethan Stout
Ethan Stout - 7 years ago
Yea,they loose their fur in spots.
Douglas Whitney
Douglas Whitney - 7 years ago
for the record if you have no expectations or beliefs others things exist that aren't really truely explored. you're ignorant
Darkfreak Rubyshine
Darkfreak Rubyshine - 7 years ago
10/10 points from me, i agree
Greater wish for a bigger fish ;)
Mark Hill
Mark Hill - 7 years ago
gta v
KingOfAllAnimals
KingOfAllAnimals - 7 years ago
Basking Shark! Wrong color and fin shape. Basking Sharks are brown and they get MASSIVE too.

The shark at 4:00 is NOT NO 40feet long.

The Shark at 5:00 is also NOT a Megladon. it is more like a Sleeper Shark. the Gills, the Fins and eyes all are Sleeper Shark.

The Megladon would be very similar to a Great White predisposing it was not more conformant to a Mako Shark or any of the sharks of that family. Honestly for what it was i would think the Megladon would be more like a Bull Shark.

For now this is ALL speculation but the video evidence is not convincing.
SikAsFukProductions BluntedMuzik
SikAsFukProductions BluntedMuzik - 7 years ago
who made the beat playing in the background? anyone?
Grace Colosimo
Grace Colosimo - 7 years ago
it is a shame but if there are megalodons out there we will know soon with all the radiation in the Pacific that they're not telling you about it's a shame the only way we're going to know what's really in the ocean is what's going to wash up on the beach soon
tiddlez1
tiddlez1 - 7 years ago
not a megalon ;)
Yonathan Muñoz
Yonathan Muñoz - 7 years ago
me cago en todo si esa bestia colosal existe porqué puede undir barcos xd
Paul Thomson
Paul Thomson - 7 years ago
maybe megalodon does still exist but over the centuries and years as it's evolved and adapted to changes and diet and become smaller and smaller . maybe megalodon has evolved into the great white shark. and in the depths of the oceans maybe there is an old great white that has grown to 30 40 or 50 feet
JOKER
JOKER - 7 years ago
3:52 looked like a RC boat and a 4 ft shark. to me it dose.
bessy lagos
bessy lagos - 7 years ago
Caminos dios son infinitos mucho descubrir creacion
leo loin
leo loin - 7 years ago
THAT Y I DON'T SWIM IN THE OCEAN ...LOL LOL | ;^)
John Buentello
John Buentello - 7 years ago
Total BS!!!
Christopher Long
Christopher Long - 7 years ago
0
WayneOKO
WayneOKO - 7 years ago
Megalodon Sharks No. Large Shark common species Yes. Since the end of whale hunting and the return of the whale populations, the sharks are feeding again. Great whites are getting bigger.
lahokc59
lahokc59 - 7 years ago
WayneOKO , for all we know our entire history of whaling has taken place in the single lifespan of a great white shark.
sam Leigh
sam Leigh - 7 years ago
looks like a over turned boat ..............?..............!!!!
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
For the most part, these are basking sharks, 6-gill or Greenland sharks. BUT, there are a few that are questionable, and 1 that is for certain real. The ones that are questionable, would be the very first one, and maybe the one swimming at the top of the water, and lastly, the one eating off off the Dead whale with the 6ft dorsal fin. The one near the submarine, that photo was captured by the Navy. That is a real photo.
Lex Luther
Lex Luther - 7 years ago
no they found that the one on shark week was the newly discovered nigladonn shark
Lisa Winter
Lisa Winter - 7 years ago
the video from the shark week when they did submine one the great white shark are big
matthewIves Ives
matthewIves Ives - 7 years ago
these were photo shopped or the wrong sharks claimed to be megalodon
silverhorder1969
silverhorder1969 - 7 years ago
I do not buy into the theory they or any other creatures lived millions of years ago. There it eveidnce that proves it all wrong that is constantly ignored. I'm sure Megladon exists.
Steve52344
Steve52344 - 7 years ago
Darren Well said.
Charles E George
Charles E George - 7 years ago
Retard... Also nice one Laura
silverhorder1969
silverhorder1969 - 7 years ago
Paul Cravin, I will respond to your link to life science article. Where Dr Schneitzer was grasping at straws to explain why and how the soft tissue was found in the Trex fossil. Many of her colleagues refused to even entertain her outlandish theory! Many of them still refused to believe it was actual biological material! Even after it was confirmed. Saying that iron preserved the material for 60 million years is laughable! It's why many of her colleagues refused to go along with her! Which by the way the report doesn't mention! I perpose because of the editor of the report, Stephanie Pappits. Who is a huge perponit of man made global warming and refuses to explain how man is causing the temperature on Mars to rise the same way it is rising on Earth! Basically Life Science report can be summed up the same way, it's Dr Schneitzer's religion!
Paul Craven
Paul Craven - 7 years ago
J-P Salminen
J-P Salminen - 7 years ago
Your "Facts" are from Creatonists, peolple who believe that world has created 6000 years ago. That theory, incl. this "flesh on a dinosaur fossile" has been debunked so many times with undeniable scientific facts..
They put out "like-science" type of writings for people to ensure that god exists and world is created by Him.
I+m not saying anything about Gods existance, but that "science" is full of holes and.. yes, Lies too.
Mark N
Mark N - 7 years ago
Finally, some sense amidst the chaos! The chicken or the egg? Although i'm not the educated kind (philosophically) ... I have some difficulty jumping on any hypothesis that's argued from "because I said so"...and that applies to both sides.

Thanks for the breath of fresh air!
Duncan Disorderly
Duncan Disorderly - 7 years ago
+Laura Stimpson  Interesting post. Although my main point for posting has to do with what you say in your opening paragraph about rational conversation and debate. I couldn't agree more. While I have no issues with being brutally honest, I don't cross the line with insults. I know the difference. Plus, it doesn't matter if everything a person says is 100% true. Once they lower the tone with petty insults, their valid and correct point counts for nothing. That's one of the powers of words. Since I know the full extent of their power, I have total respect for them and strive to use them wisely. Otherwise, what's the point of composing your thoughts?
Duncan Disorderly
Duncan Disorderly - 7 years ago
+silverhorder1969 "When dinosaur skeletons are found with soft tissue inside of them, not just one but many now. According to scientific law those skeletons have to be less than 10,000 years old! I did not come up with this as a theory. This is scientific fact!"

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Have they uncovered the odd soft tissue? Yes. Does this highly unusual and rare phenomena amount to many? Hardly. The condition of these bones can be compared to an insect found in amber, but I'm not saying it's similar conditions. What I'm saying is it is comparable, to give you an idea. Plus, they are minute parts of the fossil. The few very tiny sections of soft tissues they have found contained red blood cells and some sinew, but it was found INSIDE the bones, like the marrow. So, this meant it had been contained, comparable to an insect in amber. Are you shocked how an insect will still have soft tissue in amber after 65million years?

Granted, there have been some recent breakthroughs and I believe they have discovered soft tissue in about 6 or 8 different fossils. HOWEVER, the reason why has to do with new scientific techniques and testing methods that can detect it easier and extract it.  

Now. What I have shared  IS A scientific FACT. Not conjecture, not what "feels" right or what I read on some random site run by some inbred with a theory.
carefulcarpenter
carefulcarpenter - 7 years ago
Laura Stimpson I like your use of squared circle. I like it better if you used squared sphere. People use 2-dimentional thinking to argue against 3-dimentional concepts.
John Molloy
John Molloy - 7 years ago
the only reason any of you are on this thread is to show off how pseudo intellectual you all are!......so here's my answer!The Force is the essence of all living things.........I find your lack of faith disturbing........
Filipe Nobrega
Filipe Nobrega - 7 years ago
Jimmy Rustled lol eheheh
Trusten Baker
Trusten Baker - 7 years ago
David....david...david...david <shaking head> I bet your mother is disappointed in you huh?
Trusten Baker
Trusten Baker - 7 years ago
you said..

"The creatures we generalise to call dinosaurs died out 65 millions years
ago. No flesh or tissue remains on their fossils. Dinosaurs"

You've not done a lot of research have you? It's not mammoths they are finding the soft tissue on but dinosaurs one of which is the Terex. Are you going to continue to stick your head in the sand?
EI8HT 8IT
EI8HT 8IT - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 idiot
Trusten Baker
Trusten Baker - 7 years ago
I'm with you on this. I'm a Christian and I recently saw a video where skeletons have been found with soft tissue. I mean the scientists don't even try to explain it away. And it would be explainable if only one or so had been found but many are being found now. And like you said those skeletons have to be less than 10,000 years old. They are just ignoring their own rules. And the reason is because it places creation by God as a more than likely scenario now.

That fact alone makes them become accusatory and belligerent when someone even brings up the idea of soft tissue being found. Their leg's are being taken out from underneath them, they are scrambling now, no where to run.
mybakerykevin
mybakerykevin - 7 years ago
could it have something to do with the permafrost, ya think??
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker - 7 years ago
@Laura Stimpson You believe in gods. There is nothing rational about you.
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker - 7 years ago
As opposed to everything told you in a church? Yes. yes you should believe whats taught you in a school. As long as it isnt Sunday school.
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker - 7 years ago
Well its for sure the Earth is billions of years old and dinosaurs were around millions of years, thats for certain.
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker
His Honer, Special Council Covfefe Chocker - 7 years ago
The Earth is not thousands of year old. Go away, creationist.
KeltischWerWolf
KeltischWerWolf - 7 years ago
in the words of the rachet hood rats!!! YAAAAAAAASSSSSSSS well said +Steve52344
KeltischWerWolf
KeltischWerWolf - 7 years ago
+Bee Kendricks Wow the stupidity flows, the earth is over 4.5 Billion years old you asshat!!! Welcome to conspiracy theory heaven !!!
KeltischWerWolf
KeltischWerWolf - 7 years ago
+silverhorder1969 You need to return your degree and pay back the college for wasting their hard earned money to teach you for you to fall in to the conspiracy clutches of young earth psycho bs!!! +Tyler Rue Well said brother same thing running through my mind!!!
Stone Cold
Stone Cold - 7 years ago
Bee Kendricks there's SOOOOOO much knowledge in Antarctica that's why so many countries there bcz there's ancient technology and lost civilizations etc
pa eas
pa eas - 7 years ago
instead of making the claims you are making, how about you prove them? cite your information. i have NEVER heard of soft tissues being found
ErgoCogita
ErgoCogita - 7 years ago
"at some point everyone must make a leap of faith to trust in whatever they believe in."

Not true at all. Science is the opposite of faith. Conflating scientific conclusions with religious faith is a rather underhanded technique that has developed directly from religious thought in an attempt to level the laying field of ideas in the modern world. All ideas are not equal.

"Asking who created God is like asking if God can create a square circle."

Invoking god at the limits of understanding is on the table for dissection... always! If one claims that every thing that exists has to have a beginning, then surely God must have had a beginning too, you know, if it exists. THAT is the basic formula to the response you find so contentious. If one says, everything that exists, except God, has to have a beginning, we start to see the contrivance inherent in the idea. Defining God into existence in the grey areas of knowledge is fruitless argumentum because it is in perpetual recession as we gain more knowledge.

"the concept of God proposed by major monotheistic religions involves, as part of the definition, a being that had no beginning."

Which is dubious at best. If every other thing that exists has a finite past, then why not what created the Universe also? Why are you so reluctant to allow that channel of questioning to remain open?

"the leading theory of the Big Bang also posits that "before" the Big Bang, time did not exist."

The Lamda CDM model does not comment on anything prior to t= 10 -43 seconds. It cannot comment on anything prior. You might want to revise your description to reflect reality.
ErgoCogita
ErgoCogita - 7 years ago
"I do not buy into the theory they or any other creatures lived millions of years ago."

Theories are not to be "bought in to". They are to be assessed based upon the merits of the evidence. In this particular case, there are literal mountains of evidence overlapping from disparate fields of science showing conclusively that life has existed on this planet for more than a billion years.
John Sadowski
John Sadowski - 7 years ago
Laura Stimpson wat the fuck are u talking about wat the fuck does that have to do with the video u need to shut ur mouth and go sit down somewhere because u just made urself look stupid with that shit ur spewing nobody gives a shit
Laura Stimpson
Laura Stimpson - 7 years ago
+carefulcarpenter
Well, thank you.  I try to be conscious of my own biases and argue based on more than sheer dogma.  Honestly, I think it would be difficult to argue purely from science, purely from religion, or purely from philosophy; I find that all of them are closely connected and the response to one bleeds over into responses to everything else.
carefulcarpenter
carefulcarpenter - 7 years ago
Laura Stimpson For now, my tablet does not load beyond this post. I believe maybe because this section is long. I like your detail and organized arguments using belief as well as fact: the combining of science, religion, and philosophy.
Kyle Vorpahl
Kyle Vorpahl - 7 years ago
Bee Kendricks your right they don't carbon date dinosaur bones, what they do it look at the soil that the bones are found in under layers and layers of other soils, and look at the very long half lived elements like uranium which has half lives over a million years and date the soil that way which shows the time at which that animal would have been trapped in that layer of the earth therefore dating the animal to within a million years or so.
Brian Volek
Brian Volek - 7 years ago
Mike Price damm that's a lot of bs u left. putting words in my mouth makes u look even more ignorant. all I said is there is no way to be sure megalodon exists or other creatures. now I'm a conspiracy theorist? lol u sound dumb this video is more than likely fake too. ur just whinning on YouTube because you got told. your research doesn't prove what's in the ocean so what does that have to do with anything
Laura Stimpson
Laura Stimpson - 7 years ago
+carefulcarpenter

About what?  I made quite a few points for the argument, coming from a lot of different angles.  Which of those do you want me to continue with?  I ask because, if you're looking for me to continue scientifically and I start off on epistemology or something like that, the result is not likely to benefit either of us.  :)
Laura Stimpson
Laura Stimpson - 7 years ago
+Brascofarian

The question was addressed to a person with a specific type of attitude and argument.  To get to the root of the debate with you, I'd need to see more of your position than I've seen so far.  So, for the sake of the argument, let's say we're talking about the God of one of the major monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity, or Islam.  Go for it; show me what you've got!  I'm looking forward to a good discussion.  (And it's nice that you consider the implications of different worldviews on your argument.  That's an advanced skill that I don't see too often in Internet debates.)
Bob3D2000
Bob3D2000 - 7 years ago
+Rhett Cesare It makes me laugh when people say this as if the government is capable of keeping a secret, particularly one about animals living out in the open for anyone to find.
Rhett Cesare
Rhett Cesare - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 I'm pretty sure they exist and the government around the world know but they won't release it cause people would freak the hell out
fermin benedetti
fermin benedetti - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969, if you really want to be taken seriously...learn how to spell.
Bob3D2000
Bob3D2000 - 7 years ago
First of all, you think anthropologists have anything to do with dinosaurs, so your credibility flew right out of the window then. Secondly, you keep rabbiting on about how they've found soft tissue in dinosaur fossils. You have - deliberately I expect in order to satisfy your obvious confirmation bias - misread the articles. This is FOSSILISED soft tissue. This means it is composed of rock, formed in the impression of the original soft tissue. There's no reason that couldn't be tens of millions of years old. It's rock. This is a completely different thing from finding actual soft tissue, as is the case with many preserved mammoths, for instance. If you're a geologist, how is that you don't understand what fossilisation is?
Scotty S
Scotty S - 7 years ago
I Googled T-rex fossil soft tissue and found articles from years ago explaining how it can happen. Just because you find an anomaly, does not mean you throw out the whole theory. You find out why the anomaly occurred.
carefulcarpenter
carefulcarpenter - 7 years ago
Laura Stimpson. You have my attention. Go on.
Brascofarian
Brascofarian - 7 years ago
Laura Stimpson "Why do you believe that God does NOT exist?" You are kind of putting the cart before the horse. There isn't a single agreed upon definition of God, so to answer that question to your satisfaction, I'd need to know how you are defining God. If you were to say it's some deistic definition then I can't say whether or not it exists, so I don't really have a belief. If you were to say "the Christian God, I'd literally be typing for weeks on all the reasons it doesn't conform to reality as I've experienced it.
DRailroad
DRailroad - 7 years ago
'Horder1969 - Please point us to documentation (credible, from recognized research sources, papers) supporting your posits, "...I did not come up with this as a theory. This is scientific fact!"

Thanks, looking forward to reading that documentation (again, from credible sources).
bluediamondminer
bluediamondminer - 7 years ago
Science does not disprove god, I am sure that the calculations that men made to arrive at a few thousand years is just nonsense, men make mistakes, nowhere in the bible is an age given, at least not in human terms.
Vil Rovner
Vil Rovner - 7 years ago
Religious claims aren't evidence. The reason that creationist arguments aren't treated as credible is that they use junk "science".
Rumpel 2tilt2kin
Rumpel 2tilt2kin - 7 years ago
Sorry to interject but, i wonder how the "giant dinosaur like creature" makes it's way through this impenetrable jungle.. Also how could an enormous carnivorous fish sustain itself and remain obscure givin there would have to be a populous of them. Both are wonderful fantasy. (man and dinosaur footprints together was fake) 3rd i' m not sure i follow scientific theory to be a form of religion. How do Astrologist's theorize Pluto takes 249 years to orbit the sun and the wacky path it takes? Best highly educated guess. ok! & etc , than you take the current popular religions broken down into 3 sections?Can the idea of a god/gods equal a scientific theory , yes? Only because it cannot be dis-proven? Next section i would say is the life guidance rules to live by or collections of wisdoms that all decent human beings should be typically living by without the threat of missing out on some glorious afterlife. Last to be the endless fairy tales not any where in realm of scientific theory. The over compensation of old world cult leaders?. To impress our over superstitious ancestry,so to end my imbarrassing ramble The power of enforcing self convinced lies is a poison in all ways......Nothing i wrote was ment to be aggressive..
Laura Stimpson
Laura Stimpson - 7 years ago
+Steve52344

First things first: your entire argument was full of a specific logical fallacy called the "straw man" fallacy. It means that you're criticizing things that I never said because they're easily refuted.  It's like claiming someone who uses paper bags wants all the trees to die; they never said that at all.  All they did was use a paper bag.  Similarly, I never said A) that there is only belief, not reason, or B) that I do not trust modern science (in fact, I have repeatedly shown myself to be quite knowledgeable about modern science; I am pursuing a doctorate in a field composed primarily of understanding extremely delicate, complex, high-functioning chemical reactions).

You actually did not answer my questions, so let me see if I can, from what you've said:
1.  You believe there is no God because you have not seen any evidence for His existence, and any sources which claim to have done so you do not consider credible. 
2.  You consider the tools of science, observation, and deductive/inductive reasoning to be the ONLY credible basis for believing anything.  Am I correct so far?
3.  This one, I can't determine the answer to from what you've said, and this is actually the primary source of contention.  If you answer this question (and actually answer it this time), we may be able to have a rational discussion, and we may even find that on some points we agree (though we certainly will not agree on everything).  However, for that to happen, you'll have to honestly tell my why, in your opinion, science and observation are the only credible basis for belief.

Now that being said, there's something that I feel needs to be addressed:

What I see, when I look at where you're coming from, is actually not an interest in debate or discussion, but a lot of anger.  I don't know what happened to you to cause this, but I am sincerely sorry for whatever happened.  Believe me, I've been there (clinical depression combined with anger over what happened to me for 9+ years and counting), so I know that getting into a debate with someone on the Internet is not going to fix it or make anything better.  I've tried that, and I can tell you that it doesn't work.  It does give a bit of a rush at first, and that makes things feel better for a bit, but it doesn't fix anything in the end.  I know that to you I'm just a stranger on the internet, and one that you disagree with, but I would suggest that you look into getting help.  There are quite a few reasons I could see for reacting this way, and none of them are good positions to be in.  I know what it's like to feel like you have a sucking void at your feet trying to drag you in, and believe me, no one gets out of there alone.

I know you don't believe that this helps any, but I've been in that hole too long to sit by when anyone else shows the warning signs of being in there, so I will be praying for you.
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
No. The point is not to do with changing people's minds. Facts are facts regardless of what people believe. Belief and faith only exist because of doubt/uncertainty. No doubt, no faith.
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
Dear dumbass fucktard. No soft tissue or blood has ever been found in any dinosaur remains. None. There have been traces of fossilized protiens that came from soft tissue and blood, not actual soft tissue/blood. Stop listening to Hovind and Hamm. They are lying to you just like Trump. Make an effort to learn something rather than an effort to believe bullshit. We will all appreciate it. The Earth has enough idiots.
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
No you are.
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
Idiot. What else means nothing to you? Is this Kellyanne Conway? Love your lies!!!! Oh and BTW, you clearly know nothing at all whatsoever about carbon dating. It's okay though, alternative fact say you're right!!!!
Dillpickle64883 Playz
Dillpickle64883 Playz - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 yes I saw one and it lost a tooth so sawm out to the 30ft deep sawm down like 10 ft and got the tooth I was so happy
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
Make up your mind! Science or religion. If you choose religion, stop using science as an argument. You will lose. There are no dinosaur soft tissue remains. None. You are full of shit.
bisquitnspanky
bisquitnspanky - 7 years ago
There is evidence that you are too stupid to feed yourself. You just provided it. Thank you:)
Verdunveteran
Verdunveteran - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969: Believe what ever you want, dumbass, but two German Type IID U-boots, sure as hell did not have the range to get anywhere even remotely close to neither Cape Town nor any other point along the South African coast! So that part of this little video is fake! And so is most likely the rest of it to! Only ignorant fools like you falls for crap like this!
Steve52344
Steve52344 - 7 years ago
First off, you are the one with the belief, BIG belief (God!) and I am the NON believer. It's not MY belief versus YOURS. I either know something (more or less) or I don't know. Science nor I know for sure how the universe began. Maybe someday the Big Bang will be an absolute fact. We're slowly getting there through observation and critical thinking. That's the beauty of science. There's always room to learn more.
But you apparently DO know for sure how the universe began...by a supernatural entity for which there hasn't been a shred of solid evidence or anything that comes close to it in all the centuries of human searching. Why? -- because it's a BELIEF. And for which God, since there are a whole bunch of them? Each believer believes his/her God is the only true God. Religion divides humanity, big time. It's quite a destructive institution, but I'm hoping you will not take this personally.
The bogey-man does not exist no matter how many BELIEVE or "KNOW" he does. You agree? Same holds true for all other myths, including the big one. You do not trust modern science but you wholeheartedly trust an ancient book that claims "Let there be light" before the sun, moon or stars existed? Really?
I'm not interested, as you presume, in invoking your anger. But feel free to get angry if you feel offended. Anger is not always a bad thing. It can be a motivator. I'm interested in an exchange of REASON which is unfortunately not possible against religious dogma and superstition, regardless of how many scholarly credentials a believer may have. You may deny this if you like.
Regarding your question(s): God did not invent man. Man invented God. He needed to...out of FEAR of death and the unknown. If there was no such thing as death there'd be no such thing as God. It's a pretty safe bet. Most major religions are based on fear and subservience to what calms that fear. It's a clever arrangement, don't you think? Sort of like a drug addiction...in the form of a huge but pleasant lie. "Religion is the opiate of the people." True words. Now you know where I'm coming from. And it ain't from superstition.
Laura Stimpson
Laura Stimpson - 7 years ago
+Steve52344

First off, the warning was for everyone, not just for you. I try to be patient when people rant and rage on the Internet, but this has gone on too long and it's time someone, anyone, started having a rational conversation with the other side. If you're able to do that, great! Looking forward to the conversation! (Also, the point of the warning was that there will not be any wrath, so trolling at me won't do anything. It was not my intention to threaten anyone; I only meant to warn any trolls who have no real intention of an actual debate and are only trying to make me angry that they'll be deeply disappointed.)

You're right, of course, that people's minds are unlikely to be changed by a debate on the internet, but that's not actually the point. The point is that, by having a rational and reasonable debate, people will start to calm down, stop having the Internet equivalent of a brain aneurysm, and think about and strengthen their positions. That is worth doing, even if no one is ever going to be convinced.

As to scientific fact versus religious belief, the truth is, at some point everyone must make a leap of faith to trust in whatever they believe in. Einstein's theory of relativity, long held as the standard for higher-level physics theories, is now showing enough inconsistencies with the data that several theorists are suggesting that it may need to be revised. Theories, on which most of science is based, especially in the fields that are worthwhile for this discussion, must be constantly revised and often discarded. There are very few things in the scientific community that can actually be considered fact; the vast majority of sciences, from evolutionary biology to geology to chemistry, are founded on hypotheses or, at best, theories. Even things regarded as scientific law, of which there are comparatively few, must be revised or discarded as new data comes in. For those things that qualify as fact, I would agree that they are more obviously true than any religious claim, but that does not necessarily mean that the claims of a religion are false. If we have no groundwork laid for the conversation and no basis set for our philosophies and worldviews, all we can say is that the means of determining the truth about scientific facts are more obvious and present than the means of determining the truth about religious claims. Without getting to the root of the disagreement, that's literally the only thing we can conclude.

As to your question at the end, you're assuming that God had to have a beginning. If we assume for a minute that God exists, and that the God that exists is the God of one of the major monotheistic religions, what, exactly, would dictate that He had to begin somewhere? The God of the major monotheistic religions is generally considered either infinite, having no beginning and no end, or eternal. The idea of an eternal God takes it one step further and posits that God is outside of time and therefore the concept of a beginning and an end simply makes no sense. Before you say this is absurd, the leading theory of the Big Bang also posits that "before" the Big Bang, time did not exist. Both sides are saying something equally bizarre to the general idea of the world, but one attributes the beginning of time to natural causes and one to supernatural ones.
Asking who created God is like asking if God can create a square circle. There is no such thing as a square circle; the definition of a circle and the definition of a square are mutually exclusive, and nonsense does not stop being nonsense if it references God. Similarly, the concept of God proposed by major monotheistic religions involves, as part of the definition, a being that had no beginning. As a result, asking who or what created God is asking about the square circle; it is impossible for something fitting those criteria to exist.

Now, in order to have a fruitful discussion, we need to get to the basis of our beliefs, so let me ask a few questions to establish where you're coming from:
Why do you believe that God does NOT exist?
What is your defining authority for claims of the truth of something? (I.e. what convinces you of the truth or lack thereof of a claim?)
Why do you trust that defining authority?

Once you answer these, we can start having a useful discussion and I can start trying to explain where I'm coming from in terms that make sense based on where you're coming from.

(Also, if you think this is bad, you should see my ACTUAL dissertation!) :)
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Steve52344 Steve52344 Belief????? How in THE fuck is it a long established fact if it's based on a hypothesis?????? Last time I checked, a hypothesis is an educated guess.......right?? So how is it fact if it's based on guess work? As a matter of fact, most of science is based on guess work. For the longest biologist believed sharks only swam in warm waters, that is until one was tagged and traveled to the coast of Russia, and swam in the coldest depths. My point is, Science is based off of a bunch of educated guesses. Granted, these hypothesis come from very intelligent people, but never fails, scientists are ALWAYS wrong. You speak of facts, can we agree we know more about the moon than the ocean? If so, Megalodon could still exist. They thought the colossal squid was a fairy tale,.........until they caught one. Point in case, scientists are human which leaves wide margin for error. We will not know until one is discovered. I just find it hard to believe that they are gone...... explain the whale missing his whole rear section, with 14inch across teeth marks......
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Steve52344 FUCK NO!!!!!!!! Listen just take a second and think to yourself how many just 1 million is. OK, now you're gonna tell me 60 million years have passed???? Absolutely not
Jimmy Rustled
Jimmy Rustled - 7 years ago
Literally 5 seconds on google would have given you an answer you spastic retard.
Kapper Outdoors
Kapper Outdoors - 7 years ago
Wow, nicely said Laura.
Steve52344
Steve52344 - 7 years ago
Bee Regarding your belief, it doesn't matter if they found soft tissue. It would have no bearing on the radiometric dating or age of the fossil. Dinosaurs vanished at the end of the cretaceous 65 million years ago. That's a long established FACT. What you believe is just a belief, and beliefs are a dime a dozen.
Steve52344
Steve52344 - 7 years ago
Laura "Just a friendly warning." Loved your last paragraph. Should I fear your wrath? And yes, your reply did have an exhaustive quality to it. I can barely imagine you when you INTEND to be contentious. If I thought that debating evolution, cosmology or astronomy with a religious believer had any meaningful purpose I'd write a thesis too.
And NO, in the final analysis scientific FACTS and religious BELIEFS do NOT mix. There is more accuracy and truth in a single scientific theory than in all the world's religious beliefs. You know who said that? Forgive me for asking, but what exactly was the point you were trying to make?
Hmm. Let's get right to it. Who or what created God?
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Steve52344 Then when you find it, come back here and admit like a man with balls you were wrong!
Laura Stimpson
Laura Stimpson - 7 years ago
Steve52344

The issue with all radioactive decay dating is that it assumes that the concentrations of the parent and daughter isotopes started out at more or less 100% parent isotope, and that the sample was completely isolated from any liquid seepage containing any amount of parent or daughter isotopes at all. At that point, having even a trace of daughter isotope in the initial rock or even a trace of seepage can throw off dating ideas by massive amounts. There are known examples of lava flows that were documented in the 1960s, leaving igneous rock over layers of sedimentary rock that have been on the surface for as long as we've known about the place, and the lava flows were dated at approximately 1 million years EARLIER than the rock underneath it. (This is probably due to the first issue; daughter isotope levels were likely very high in the igneous rock compared to the sedimentary layers.) With fossils, the primary issue with dating would be seepage contamination, since the very process by which fossils are formed involves mineral-rich water getting into the buried organism.

Also, there are several historical inaccuracies in your critique. First: As early as 2000 BC, the Greeks knew that the world was round. It was common knowledge by the time the Bible was written, even according to the earliest estimates. Second, did you know that the Bible is far more scientifically accurate than any religious text written before the advent of "modern" science? In contrast to most texts, which have the world on the back of a turtle or some other animal or being carried by something, the Bible talks about it being "hung in the sky". If you were explaining, without complex calculations or the codified theory of gravity, how the Earth stays in its orbit, it would likely be in similar terms. Third, about germs and diseases: the means to make functional glass lenses to make a microscope to see microbes did not exist yet. It wasn't that anyone was too "ignorant" or too "poisoned by religion" to discover them; glass formulas could not produce a form of glass clear enough, nor could glassblowers form a shape smooth enough, to have the slightest chance of seeing anything on a microscopic level. Furthermore, I fail to see how a lack of technological prowess should change anything regarding a religious or philosophical text. No one mocks Aristotle's philosophy because he didn't know about photons or sonar or the Internet.

Now, as to your final "point": silverhorder1969 has repeatedly disavowed being religious in any way, shape, or form. You do not have the right to continuously insist that they are actually something which they have said repeatedly that they are not. Now, that being said, I am religious, evangelical Christian to be exact. Astronomy fascinates me, and I can argue about it all day; other hobbies of mine include organic and higher-level inorganic chemistry, biochemistry, geological analysis, and quantum physics (as a little light reading if I get bored). I am also going into medicine and will be the second person in my family to get a doctorate. There is literally no reason why science and Christianity should be incompatible. Two things that are incompatible are Christianity and Secular Humanism, as they are both religions. One is open about its leaps of faith, the other is not. Truth be told, in my opinion, it takes more faith to believe everything that is currently taught to justify Secular Humanism than it does to believe that yes, there is a God.

To be honest, I suspect that you didn't read all the way through, but if you did, good for you! If you want to argue any of my points, feel free, but be warned: you will not be able to goad me into losing my temper. I will respond calmly, rationally, and exhaustively to any arguments, so if you plan to reply, make sure it's worthwhile. I'm sure you have good arguments; I'd like to see them, to be honest. Healthy debate is always a benefit.

However, if you do choose to argue in a derogatory style without any real arguments, as I have seen other people attempt to do, I will reply exhaustively, I will remain calm and rational, and you will look silly. Just a friendly warning. Good night!
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 Agreed!! When they are finding fleshy material on bones that are "supposedly" millions of years old...... something doesn't add up.
silverhorder1969
silverhorder1969 - 7 years ago
Thanks Bee Kendricks. No one here seems to be able to give a viable explanation about anything other than I'm a dumbass. I'm not a religious man, don't go to church, but everybody wants to throw " your a creationist " at me. All I'm saying is there are too many assumptions in a lot of it for me to conclusions.
Peke
Peke - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 and so does jesus, who's with me???
Steve52344
Steve52344 - 7 years ago
silverhorder You like to babble. When the holy babble -- I mean bible -- was written they all thought the Earth was flat and didn't know that most of the diseases they suffered from were caused by germs and not the devil. In other words the authors of the bible were ignorant. A ten year old of today knows more about the world than your ancient guys did...thanks to the progress of science. In case you didn't know (and you don't) Carbon-14 is not used to date dinosaur fossils or anything else older than 50,000 years. Potassium/argon and uranium/lead are used, among other radiometric methods.
Your mind has been poisoned by religion. You're afraid of the truth. All creationists are. You belittle the sciences of geology, evolutionary biology and astronomy, but you worship the science of medicine when you're sick. Hypocrites!
Answer yes or no -- is there such a thing as a million years ago?
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
also keep in mind the depth they have to go to to receive the fossils, optimal preservation conditions and temperature. Samples from soft tissues found from the duckbill dino and the T rex, have iron rich blood that has certain properties and complexities that once the tissue begins to "break down" the iron releases and creates tiny iron nano paricles to almost protect the tissue. it by no means should be called tissue since it is brittle but rubbery...basically the further we excavate the more likely to find more blood and tissue. but leave that to the pros kid. you are far from a pro.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
+silverhorder1969 i call bullshit on your "degree" or you wouldnt refute evidence and come up with nonsensical theories. Also you dont even know how to find out the age of an object whether organic or inorganic...also a redflag. You're a kook, a crazy tinfoil hat theorist. Why lie about a degree and probably a highschool paper on erosion, which also has a massive flaw in the argument.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
+Darren Agnew it hurts my brain at how dense these people are mate...like whut..
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
+Bee Kendricks you people are honestly no better than religious kooks...10k year old?! How can you be that dense..
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 When I was talking about carbon dating has giant holes in it. I believe like you the planet is not millions of years old.....10,000s maybe.
Darren Agnew
Darren Agnew - 7 years ago
Why study a geographical science if you believe that most of it is some kinda conspiracy theory and the scientific methodology it relies upon is so flawed?. I mean , why even bother studying any of the sciences science. Lets time travel back to the time when the bible  hindered us from thinking  and that all evidence to the contrary was heretical . I shudder to think where we would be now.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
+Bee Kendricks sharks eat other sharks. The greenland shark which resides where you think the megalodon "migrated" to. And that is a inconsistent theory. Killer whales eat sharks in the arctic, so do sperm whales and other creatures. There is no evidence, do you have a clue of how much technology resides beneath the ocean? Hydrophones and radar equipment on ships/oil rigs etc. Heck they got camera on the oil lines now that are deep down and yet still nothing. And keep in mind this tech has been around for 70 years. We keep making discoveries yet nothing big
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
kevinholley kevinholley Btw, in the above comment I was taking "Mike Price" not you silverhorder....... I follow you %100.
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Mike Price We never said these sharks are Megalodon, our argument is it could still be out there. Listen we know basically absolutely nothing about the oceans. The deepest part which is 7.3 miles deep has only been visited twice. So yeah, there is a very good chance it is still here. We don't know ....my theory is, whatever wiped out the land, may have spooked the Megalodon, and maybe the migrated to the Artic, from there they remained and evolved into the Salmon shark. I say that because it looks just like a great white with the exception of some spots near the tail. With the water being so cold, maybe it evolved to become smaller to utilize less energy needed in colder water. How ironic though, the King of the ocean evolves smaller. It has been proven that sharks remember where places are and whether to never visit again. There was a test done to see if a new shark repellent would work on sharks. The repellent was made with shark blood. They chummed the water......minutes later they are surrounded by sharks. They threw the repellent into the water...... INSTANTANEOUSLY, they bolted in every direction. A few of the shark had been remote tagged. The sharks did not return.........ever again. Check out the Salmon shark
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Mike Price We never said these sharks are Megalodon, our argument is it could still be out there. Listen we know basically absolutely nothing about the oceans. The deepest part which is 7.3 miles deep has only been visited twice. So yeah, there is a very good chance it is still here. We don't know ....my theory is, whatever wiped out the land, may have spooked the Megalodon, and maybe the migrated to the Artic, from there they remained and evolved into the Salmon shark. I say that because it looks just like a great white with the exception of some spots near the tail. With the water being so cold, maybe it evolved to become smaller to utilize less energy needed in colder water. How ironic though, the King of the ocean evolves smaller. It has been proven that sharks remember where places are and whether to never visit again. There was a test done to see if a new shark repellent would work on sharks. The repellent was made with shark blood. They chummed the water......minutes later they are surrounded by sharks. They threw the repellent into the water...... INSTANTANEOUSLY, they bolted in every direction. A few of the shark had been remote tagged. The sharks did not return.........ever again. Check out the Salmon shark guys just look at it. Every Megalodon picture shows it fatter than a great white........
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 so that school that i "believe" in and that is teaching me intelligent facts and not horse shit conspiracy...a text book that has facts in it about actual confirmed facts has just trumped your whole argument
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
+silverhorder1969 Unlike relative dating methods, absolute dating methods provide chronological estimates of the age of certain geological materials associated with fossils, and even direct age measurements of the fossil material itself. To establish the age of a rock or a fossil, researchers use some type of clock to determine the date it was formed. Geologists commonly use radiometric dating methods, based on the natural radioactive decay of certain elements such as potassium and carbon, as reliable clocks to date ancient events. Geologists also use other methods - such as electron spin resonance and thermoluminescence, which assess the effects of radioactivity on the accumulation of electrons in imperfections, or "traps," in the crystal structure of a mineral - to determine the age of the rocks or fossils.

All elements contain protons and neutrons, located in the atomic nucleus, and electrons that orbit around the nucleus (Figure 5a). In each element, the number of protons is constant while the number of neutrons and electrons can vary. Atoms of the same element but with different number of neutrons are called isotopes of that element. Each isotope is identified by its atomic mass, which is the number of protons plus neutrons. For example, the element carbon has six protons, but can have six, seven, or eight neutrons. Thus, carbon has three isotopes: carbon 12 (12C), carbon 13 (13C), and carbon 14 (14C) (Figure 5a). In other words c-14 isnt the only method. Hey i guess school taught me a lot. And yes it helps me win arguments over supersticious idiots.
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 Standing Ovation!!!!!!! Finally!!!!!!! It feels good to read and find there is someone else out there who knows whats going on. Well Said.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 Absolute dating is used to determine a precise age of a rock or fossil through radiometric dating methods. This uses radioactive minerals that occur in rocks and fossils almost like a geological clock. It's often much easier to date volcanic rocks than the fossils themselves or the sedimentary rocks they are found in. do you have another method to discover the age of anything? because its pretty fucking accurate.
silverhorder1969
silverhorder1969 - 7 years ago
To the rest of you on here, believe what you want to believe. If you want to believe in c14 dating go ahead. It takes a lot of faith to believe in it, and I'm not a religious man!
silverhorder1969
silverhorder1969 - 7 years ago
Steve52344, radio carbon dating is what they use to determine the age of an object. In doing so there are many assumptions that have to be made. We know that about .0000750% of c14r that exists in every living creature begins to disapate as soon as it dies. At that point they measure it by its half life. Every 5700 or so years a half life of radiation disapates and leaves behind nitrogen. There are many assumptions that are made when an object to be dated. Like what was the climate like, how much of the Suns radiation penetrated the atmosphere, ect. What you don't hear when it comes to carbon dating is the known failure rates of it. Like a pig that died was buried and 1 year later it was dug up and carbon dated to 1,655yrs old. Or how petrafied trees in multiple layers of earth c14 to millions of years difference from the top to the bottom. This is stuff you can't just brush off. Like I described before the soft tissue found in Tyranasours Rex said to be 60 million years old! By the way that was one found fully in tact! 60million years and fully in tact skeleton? That have had to endure thousands of earthquakes? At least 50,000 quakes over a 9.2 RS on average that is how many quakes that in tact skeleton would have had to indure, and still stay in tact? If anyone can believe that they're insane!! Too many assumptions out the ass!!!
Steve52344
Steve52344 - 7 years ago
We're apparently talking to a teenage idiot who thinks he's a geologist. Idiot: Soft T-rex tissue has NEVER been found. Get off the dumb internet and read a science book...for the first time. Again: How old is the Earth?
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 im sure it has been explained to you already but you still dont get it as i can tell.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
All of the "megalodons" in these youtube videos are known species. Remove your head from the sand.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
silverhorder1969 it was calcified to be specific which means nothing. mammoths have even been found with soft tissue...with the right temperature and depending on where in the world this dino died and the properties of the clay encasing it, the possibility of tissue being preserved is plausible simply due to the fact that clay seals the dino bones in a cocoon like fashion.
you also keep avoiding the questions about your "profession" which also makes me call bullshit on your credibility
silverhorder1969
silverhorder1969 - 7 years ago
Just explain to me Mike since you got all the FACTS! How do you explain soft tissue in Tyranasours Rex skeletons that supposedly died out over 60 million years ago? That's all explain it! And don't tell me there isn't any evidence of it! It's all over the Internet. Since you know.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
also for anyone else who doesnt understand that the meaning of the word FACT - "the truth about events as opposed to interpretation"
go get hard evidence instead of running on superstition
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
Brian Volek you people need to learn what photoshop is and the meaning of doctored images, inaccurate measurements and not enough knowledge on shark species in the ocean. great whites are the third largest. the largest being the whale shark and the second largest being a basking shark. you can put a 20 foot shark next to a 15 foot boat and itll look huge. i believe facts, its called not being gullible.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
Brian Volek i never said i got all the answers buddy. jesus you conspiracy kids are dense. ok let me dum it down....so what i meant is that FACTS are what people with common sense and intelligence follow...that being said, the megalodon is extinct. its a fact.
Brian Volek
Brian Volek - 7 years ago
Mike Price that's the thing I don't know everything about the Earth but you got all the answers.
Mike Price
Mike Price - 7 years ago
Brian Volek i believe in the research and facts i have uncovered in the field. i assume you just surfed the internet? never travelled and actually looked for evidence? let me just clarify that i dont believe in a conspiracy theory like a crazy nutjob. if the megalodon is swimming the ocean, the the T Rex is walking the earth right now. do you see how stupid that sounds? thats how all of you crazy people sound. get an education and do some actual research instead of looking at youtube videos and thinking you know everything about the earth.
Mirajane Sayla
Mirajane Sayla - 7 years ago
Steve52344 humans can explore.space.but still trying to discover the ocean? any moron can smell bullshit. if scientist really want to they can.monitor.entire earth and its life or atleast chose what to make public
joseluisnewyork
joseluisnewyork - 7 years ago
We need a bigger boat.
Charles Bartlett
Charles Bartlett - 7 years ago
Please.
DNT ZEKTUZ
DNT ZEKTUZ - 7 years ago
music soung??
Atlien Rider
Atlien Rider - 7 years ago
Taylor Dayne...Tell it to my Heart
Juana LALOCA
Juana LALOCA - 7 years ago
the oceans are not the blood and this is not our planet, there is where human destruction begins
Larsoboy123
Larsoboy123 - 7 years ago
Gerard Hart If earth should belong to us the universe does too since we are part of it.

Oh wait that means we dont own shit.
Gerard Hart
Gerard Hart - 7 years ago
your comment is so childlike you went and deleted it.LOL, "The planet dont belong to us" you grow up you Liberal ass pussy.
Juana LALOCA
Juana LALOCA - 7 years ago
ohhh Gerard you don´t have Hart, if you ever grow up, will be a pleasure explain you meanwile suck my dick
Gerard Hart
Gerard Hart - 7 years ago
of course its our planet dipshit at least until we are extinict!
Juana LALOCA
Juana LALOCA - 7 years ago
you surely are, maybe lately I´ll explain you
Bee Kendricks
Bee Kendricks - 7 years ago
Dwight Goss No, it's most certainly not our planet. We are nothing more than an experiment in some advanced civilization's geranium.
Juana LALOCA
Juana LALOCA - 7 years ago
That sense of ownership as well as superiority, those human ideas that do not have anything to do with nature, that justified pride is based on the destruction that still dare to call our home. We are the only animal species misplaced, some evolution babies infants that we believe are the redeemers of the universe, don´t you think that a change in the starting point would not make difference?, that will build respect?
Juana LALOCA
Juana LALOCA - 7 years ago
That sense of ownership as well as superiority, those human ideas that do not have anything to do with nature, that justified pride is based on the destruction that still dare to call our home. We are the only animal species misplaced, some evolution babies infants that we believe are the redeemers of the universe, don´t you think that a change in the starting point would not make difference?, that will build respect?
Juana LALOCA
Juana LALOCA - 7 years ago
do not seems we fuck up anything, thats superiority believing consecuences
2x4 Barrels
2x4 Barrels - 7 years ago
I am with you Hector . i think we should get out it seems we fuck up anything we go near
PAZZUZU XNYNZN
PAZZUZU XNYNZN - 7 years ago
q mal rollo, ya podrían extinguirse del todo joder
Manolo G.
Manolo G. - 7 years ago
music song?
olegario clash royal y clash of clan Cardozo
olegario clash royal y clash of clan Cardozo - 7 years ago
??
olegario clash royal y clash of clan Cardozo
olegario clash royal y clash of clan Cardozo - 7 years ago
v: es real

Similar videos
for Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

Shark videos

Grouper eats 4ft shark in one bite

42,264 likes 66,031,497 views 10 years ago

Goliath grouper eating a black tip shark in one bite off the coast of Bonita Springs Florida. August 2014. This...

Shark videos

Megalodon Sharks still lives!! Evidence that...

100,718 likes 65,738,527 views 10 years ago

Some Amazing Video Links: 5 Cases where Wild Animals saved Humans https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhneeCCBub4 5...

Kayak

Octopus Caught While Kayak Fishing

59,521 likes 62,303,474 views 13 years ago

http://www.facebook.com/ZeeNorthwest http://www.hobiefishing.com/ http://www.kokatat.com/ http://nextadventure.net/...

Shark videos

Shark Attack 3: Megalodon

32,528 likes 51,597,296 views 17 years ago

For more utterly stupid clips please subscribe!

Shark videos

Surprised Baby Shark

103,381 likes 50,490,050 views 11 years ago

Baby shark likes to tickle.

Shark videos

Shark Fishing Battle | Dude Perfect

342,276 likes 44,611,619 views 9 years ago

Time to CATCH and RELEASE some SHARKS! ► Click HERE for crazy fishing VIDEOS! http://bit.ly/1Avn0qk ► Click HERE to...

Related videos
to Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

Shark videos

Grouper eats 4ft shark in one bite

42,264 likes 66,031,497 views 10 years ago

Goliath grouper eating a black tip shark in one bite off the coast of Bonita Springs Florida. August 2014. This...

Shark videos

Megalodon Sharks still lives!! Evidence that...

100,718 likes 65,738,527 views 10 years ago

Some Amazing Video Links: 5 Cases where Wild Animals saved Humans https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhneeCCBub4 5...

Shark videos

Shark Attack 3: Megalodon

32,528 likes 51,597,296 views 17 years ago

For more utterly stupid clips please subscribe!

Shark videos

Surprised Baby Shark

103,381 likes 50,490,050 views 11 years ago

Baby shark likes to tickle.

Shark videos

Shark Fishing Battle | Dude Perfect

342,276 likes 44,611,619 views 9 years ago

Time to CATCH and RELEASE some SHARKS! ► Click HERE for crazy fishing VIDEOS! http://bit.ly/1Avn0qk ► Click HERE to...

Shark videos

450 pound Black Marlin eaten by shark

35,332 likes 44,185,812 views 18 years ago

This 450 pound black marlin was caught off Cairns, Australia. After about 22 minutes it panicks and goes down deep,...

About Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings

The "Monster Submarine Shark Caught on Tape - 2017 Documentary Collection of Best Sightings" video is part of the Shark videos category, which contains similar videos like this one.

Subscribe hot viral Aquatic videos!