Surf NYC (4K resolution)

ADVERTISING

LuxoGear Emergency Whistles with Lanyard

Shop now »

NOCO Genius GEN5X2, 2-Bank, 10A (5A/Bank) Smart Marine Battery Charger

Shop now »

RHINO USA Boat Trailer Transom Straps (2PK)

Shop now »

LUCKY Kayak Portable Fish Depth Finder

Shop now »

Seaview 180 V3 Full Face Snorkel Mask

Shop now »

Most popular comments
for Surf NYC (4K resolution)

Live comments
Comments on YouTube

r - 6 years ago

Surprised by everyone who's never seen the ocean flat. Pipeline in Oahu is flat all summer. You'd never know it hits 20+ for weeks in winter. NYC / LI season is August-November (hurricane season) we hit 10-15 shore breaks with a current that would make you piss. I'm sure most y'all writing negative comments wouldn't get in for that and never have! True surfers with real spirit don't put down a fellow surfing community. Many transplants in New York but those of us born and bred, we're ocean folk. Fishing boating surfing you name it. They hold the quicksilver pro here in Long Beach sometimes. The breaks in Montauk are famous. You're cool for being from Cali, brah, but nobody gives a fuck

r - 6 years ago

Get in when there's snow on the ground, the water temp is 33 degrees air temp in the negatives with windchill, not a soul to be seen unless you go with somebody, then talk shit about New York / east coast surfers! You wanna see dedicated passionate badasses, or you wanna act superior for surfing in perfect weather all the time? Everyone knows west coast is soft ;)

Romyo Nazmy - 7 years ago

mol grabbing his skateboard

CellarDoorx06 - 7 years ago

I love my Internet!

Ronsonmobile - 7 years ago

Some sick tubes u rode in this video my dude thanks!

JIX SAW - 7 years ago

was this video done on the ipad pro

miguel bejarano reyes - 7 years ago

pero no habia olas XD

DKRecords - 8 years ago

This is NOT a Full 4K its 3840 x 1600 a FULL 4K is 3840 x 2160! Dont believe me Right click the video & click stats for NERDS!

Divya Bhatt - 8 years ago

How can I find out at what resolution am I able to see this on my laptop?

Platinado Gamer - 8 years ago

+Divya Bhatt In Control Panel find Display and then Resolution.

DragonSlayerEX - 8 years ago

MY EYES HEART SO DAMN MUCH GOOD GOD

10. comment for Surf NYC (4K resolution)

Stefan Stefaan - 9 years ago

My 2ghz Processor is too slow for this, lol ? and my RAM need 500mb.... wtf? Holy shit

activatepornforme - 9 years ago

Wow. This 4K video really shone on my overpriced iMac Retina - you can really see the detail on how shitty NYC really is. Like the narrative too, how NYC promises everything and then fucks you in the ass.

Stace's Churhaa Adventures - 9 years ago

must be waiting for an earthquake or something aye brah ahhaahha

Eric Marten - 9 years ago

He's going to be waiting a long time for a wave...

Erik Conover - 9 years ago

Loved the color grading you used...but surfing lake Atlantic lol? FLAT

Krzysztof Molak - 9 years ago

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL. Seriously DUDE??

Bikelife productions - 9 years ago

whats he waiting for?
i hate the east coast KOOOKS
I guess thats head high in nyc

r - 6 years ago

Bikelife productions ... we live by the ocean dude, same shit as whatever super awesome place you're from. Sometimes it's flat sometimes it's raging

Encore1234567890 - 9 years ago

My i7 core desktop just laughed at this and ask for something more to do. lol

Ivan Ohanessian - 9 years ago

I can't see the video in 4k

Incentium - 9 years ago

Your monitor can't take it.

Danich Ivanov - 9 years ago

on my laptop(asus n56vz) runs smooth. but i don't really see a huge difference between UHd and FullHd on 1920x1080 screen. and i think that this technology was made for a movie theater, and not 42inch home tv. not either a phone, or a laptop. per today for everyday usage FullHd is more than enough i think. maybe after about 5 years things may change. my ipad retina is stunning btw)

Danich Ivanov - 9 years ago

yep)

Incentium - 9 years ago

thats because you aren't actually seeing it at 4k. Your monitor limits you to FHD UNLESS downsampling.

20. comment for Surf NYC (4K resolution)

Aposlan RC2 FR - 9 years ago

I have optique fiber and he have 10 fps in this fucking video its a joke ? :D

Stephen Potter - 9 years ago

only goes up to 720p, i have a 2014 macbook pro retina, besides 4k, it doesn't show me an option for 1080p????

Baka Tenshi - 9 years ago

Finally a 4K video on YouTube!!!
Now, my HD Graphics' ultimate test...(i5 3210M)...begins.

Nicholas - 9 years ago

video was a bit choppy for me, the playback. no issues with buffering though 50mbps <3

probably my CPU tho, any help?

cpu: amd phenom ii x4 965 3.4ghz
gpu: amd radeon hd 7950
ram: 6gb

brian head - 9 years ago

I can play 2160P perfectly off my 5.7 Ghz Overclocked Pentium 4 EE computer. I just put a liquid nitrogen block on the Cpu and used a hybrid motherboard with 16 GB of Corsair Dominator heatsink DDR2 RAM and 2 Nvidia 660 Ti's in SLI ....EVGA 750i Motherboard PCIe 2.0 2x16 SLI FTW!!!

haha just kidding!

Aposlan RC2 FR - 9 years ago

LIE!

James Martin-Davies - 9 years ago

Was going to say, I'm play 4K off my bog standard 200 pound laptop plugged in to a 4K TV without a hiccup.

brian head - 9 years ago

BTW...there are no waves! He'll be waitin' for a LONG time!

Incentium - 9 years ago

+longlivegoodpeople haha

longlivegoodpeople - 9 years ago

There was actually supposed to be a tsunami within 4 hours.

brian head - 9 years ago

Its not about bandwidth always....Its not about cpus and gpus always...ALL YOU PEOPLE GET OFF YOUTUBE!!! Then I can watch it!

Reflection Zenite - 9 years ago

No buffering,video card:AMD A8-5600k 3,6ghz no lag.
http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3673867900

8 Bit Tree Productions - 9 years ago

Wow...

Rui Pedro Silva - 9 years ago

LOL Nice video... BUT NO WAVES!!! SHAME... REALLY...

Joe Davey - 9 years ago

ahaha yeah i saw that.... :3

30. comment for Surf NYC (4K resolution)

lynchmob72 - 9 years ago

Wish i was watching this on an actual 4k screen...also, no problems with 150mb until i got about a min into it. Then it started skipping, but it's 8 PM, so i kind of expect that.

Gabriel's Movies - 9 years ago

http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3617388507

Tuco Salamanca - 9 years ago

i3-550 3.20 could handle it. not bad.

william5357 - 9 years ago

I watched all the videos, no buffering at all (:

Athon Aron - 9 years ago

O processador pira

SluttyPop - 9 years ago

The quality isn't that good

Jonny Wilson - 9 years ago

No buffering at all, Impressive.

Mhc - 9 years ago

Can't select 4k. why?

Olly West - 9 years ago

Oh, how I love you, Intel Core i5-4440...

Ryan Speck - 9 years ago

i7 quad with gtx 770m running cpu at 2-3% in full screen

Julian Valencia - 10 years ago

ahhh my poor nyc :( all that traveling to show up for a flat day -__- hahahaha gotta get on that magicseaweeed!

Dale - 10 years ago

i can only watch in 1080p without lag but 4k works with some lags :(

MisterGamer GameplaysVideos - 10 years ago

fuck, some peoples running 4k, and my PC cannot run HD only 480p...

Alexander Bochkarev - 10 years ago

10mbit is pretty enough for this shit

larender - 10 years ago

el que se pueda ver en esa calidad me sorprende pero da mas lag que el dead rising o que la compania de steam y por poco supera a internet explorer

Connor Saiche - 10 years ago

I'd have more luck headbutting through concrete than watching this at native resolution :L

Kolonel Marc - 10 years ago

loading in 4K res took 3 seconds lol (on 180mbs)
idk what buffering all of you are talking about

Антон Костоусов - 10 years ago

я не дождался загрузки

jojomaster - 10 years ago

very very long load time with DSL 3k, but had no problems watching it on an iMac (i5 2,9Ghz, 8GB DDR3 RAM, GeForce GT 750M)

David G. Tran - 10 years ago

Something tells me he doesn't know much about surfing - there were no waves when he got to the water

50. comment for Surf NYC (4K resolution)

Samuel Bétrisey - 10 years ago

Fine with 50Mbps, no need to wait for buffering :)
But I haven't a 4K screen haha

HeyIt'sCindy - 9 years ago

same here

Prydaz - 10 years ago

dammm 2 hours to watch 2 min vids on 4K wtf worlds is going please #bitchPlease

Wade Quilty - 10 years ago

What is going on is that you probably have insufficient bandwidth to actually play the video in 4K. #facepalm

Paul Davidson - 10 years ago

913,061 people TRIED to watch this

Incentium - 9 years ago

Not many people have a 3840x1080 monitor. It's not possible anymore with the new AMD drivers.

DJ C. - 10 years ago

And ONE succeeded haha

Himede888881 - 10 years ago

you need at least 50mps to watch this that's my guess. im at 57 mps & i still get lag at 4k resolution

Massive Douche - 10 years ago

You're getting lag because your computer doesn't have high enough specs to run it smoothly. The only thing that would be affected by your connection would be stream time.

Lil_ Danny904 - 10 years ago

im watchtin 4k on my macbook pro retina an it doesn't look too impressive

Antimatter31 - 8 years ago

+Massive Douche This is a quad HD video. So to watch it at full quality, he would need a Quad HD screen. Like the 5k iMac or an Asus monitor (its got a long name, I cba to look for it).

Ryan Speck - 9 years ago

+ED Films retina sucks... apple sucks... get a real computer, a real 4k monitor, and a real internet connection

brownboii305 - 10 years ago

Macbook sucks balls! Thats why.

ED Films - 10 years ago

What are you talking about? I'm on my retina display MacBook and it looks fantastic!

Massive Douche - 10 years ago

Probably cause you're watching it on a mac ya 'tard. Retina display is just a hype term. It means nothing. To fully experience this, you need to play it on a nice big HDTV.

MasterGaming - 10 years ago

omg 4k is amazing :D

Joseph Gilbert - 10 years ago

laaaaaaaaaag

oscarmac34 - 10 years ago

lo pongo en 4K y mi pc explota

Garner Marshall - 10 years ago

#SurfNYC #YouTube4K

Immersed - 10 years ago

A video about surfing, with no surfing :-)

Carspotter Jeroen - 10 years ago

Looking good!

Mark Roldan - 10 years ago

dude forgot his roller blades and scooter.

Luca Caovilla - 10 years ago

fuck that, I even have 4K monitor hahaha

Michi Lo - 10 years ago

i can watch it only in 240p =(

Julio Villanueva - 10 years ago

Don't be fooled. The fact you are watching this videos doesn't mean you're watching it in 4k, which is what's intended to. It all depends on resolution of your monitor. I'm watching it with my mac air and it looks awesome, but it's only 720p. You need a monitor with at least 3840 x 2160 pixels or 4096 x 2160. That's 4K.

Huehuehue - 10 years ago

we are the waves?

Christopher - 10 years ago

It played quite well on my connection, it wasn't perfect but overall at full resolution it was watchable. Then again your monitor, bandwidth, video card all play a factor. Good to know I can watch 4K video, I won't push to 8K !

mattalones93 - 10 years ago

For people talking about your graphics card, the CPU drives YouTube unless you do something REALLY tricky.

itsLean ★ - 10 years ago

HTML5 definitely don't work well with this resolution. Bring back the flash player, Google!

itsLean ★ - 10 years ago

+TheError404 may be a difference bbetween video cards or idk, but in chrome with my computer I can watch 1080p perfectly with flash (50% cpu usage avergae) but not with HTML5 (99,9% cpu usage, fps totally limited)

TheError404 - 10 years ago

Hmmm, for me HTML5 is FAAAR less laggy with 4k than the flash player.

thlamz - 10 years ago

third day buffering and loaded the first 3 seconds

Private - 10 years ago

What is layer (black edge): 1920 x 900 ? Thanks! Amazing video!

Rodrigo Klepacz - 10 years ago

digging that anamorphic juiciness! (a bit disappointed with the 'surfing')

vic2net - 10 years ago

LOL I use processor 1 core sempron 2 Ghz,Geforce 7800 LE 128 mb video,and monitor resolution is only 1152x864,and people who have Full HD monitors,wtf you want 4K?

Zishan Mei - 10 years ago

the video's quality is amazing, and for those who don't know, 4k quality is like 4 1080p screens put into one

Trombley - 10 years ago

Yes,but it's pretty darn fine compared to the regular "potato videos" on youtube.

pakkiaman2 - 10 years ago

you can say what do you prefer but I SEE THE DIFFERENCE EVEN A LITTLE ps i have a 7970 hd AMD

BUDA20 - 10 years ago

Too much compression in the original

ekiroto9 - 10 years ago

Maybe he was planning on paddling across the atlantic to Ireland or something. Don't get me wrong there are beaches in Queens and out further on Long Island that get small but surfable waves and bigger ones during hurricane season but this is a bad day at the wrong beach. Clearly these guys don't know much about surfing in NYC.

davi1 - 10 years ago

should be called "Flat NYC" lame.

trued1 - 10 years ago

What about a 27" iMac?

cKes - 10 years ago

Its funny how the quality option doesnt say hd when viewing in 4k

Becker Brothers - 10 years ago

There're still more detail. Morons.

Andrew Massey - 10 years ago

The Retina MBP's screen is not 4K, and the scaling that has to be done for the video to be presented properly is more than likely making it worse than 4K. If it had a 4K screen on it, it would look absolutely superb.

Bassoca - 10 years ago

No 4000X2000

PainDespairForlornEnlightenment - 10 years ago

Yes, you will be able to spot the herpes directly after 4K!

Дмитрий Хрюстов - 10 years ago

4096x1706

Ulysses - 10 years ago

I'm watching this in 360p

MsAllvideo - 10 years ago

I Can't Play it smoothly with 4K...

ekiroto9 - 10 years ago

ummm where's the waves?

RastaWorldPeace - 10 years ago

i'm watching this on my retina macbook pro and the 4k resolution does not look better than 1080p! oO

BunnyCentauri - 10 years ago

lmao

David Hughes - 10 years ago

4K resolution is 4096 × 3072 so if you're computer's max resolution is only 1920 x 1080 or 1920 x 1200 you won't see anywhere near what 4K is like.

michaelbhs05yb - 10 years ago

Or rather, what it WON'T do for porn. ;-)

nexus1g - 10 years ago

It's sad to see people complaining about their computer not even being able to handle playing the video, and here I am actually able to stream more than the bitrate necesasry to play the video.

NanoTech Ent - 10 years ago

Awesome. This will go great with our new Nuvola NP-1. The very first 4k streaming player!

JDSP - 10 years ago

there is actually a large increase in bitrate which is visable

acalarmarrrr - 10 years ago

Plenty of 1440p monitors out there.

Kawaii Usagi - 10 years ago

Somehow this video in original resolution loads faster than many 480p videos here. Youtube, what's wrong with you?

Top Doge - 10 years ago

lol imacs didn't invent 2560x1440 displays, in fact they didn't adopt them until quick recently

Ados Constant - 10 years ago

Placebo video 4K only possible on a 4K monitor.. 99% of people just think they see a difference morons

100. comment for Surf NYC (4K resolution)

NicGaming - 10 years ago

Close enough :P

topher1976au - 10 years ago

unless u have an imac :P 2560x1440. Not quite UHD tho

Jungle Speed - 10 years ago

1080p ou 4K

Саня - 10 years ago

Чумаааааа, вот это качество!!!!

sirmidor - 10 years ago

it doesn't have enough pixels no, but when looking at an hd video on an sd screen, the image is very pixelated, very jagged edges and the sort, this doesn't have that difference.

NicGaming - 10 years ago

No, because your monitor only has 1920x1080px, but the video has 3840x2160px - your monitor just can't display better than 1080p!

Vitaly Tomilov - 10 years ago

Watching it on two 30" monitors, at 2560x1600 each, I can barely see any difference between 720P and 4K. You really need a TV panel that's not smaller than 65" for the 4K to make a difference.

Naud van Dalen - 10 years ago

So in 2096 our eyes are suddenly better?

sirmidor - 11 years ago

is it weird that it doesn't look that different from 1080p?

shredhappy101 - 11 years ago

Make it take longer to download?

Brythespy - 11 years ago

hee hee I downloaded a 96p .3gp version of this video. FUCK 4K (Not really, it's great new technology and I look forward to it becoming the standard in the upcoming years, and hopefully we'll see new... Oh fuck, close parenthesis.)

JF Tolaguera - 11 years ago

Je trouve que c'est sympa sur mon MacBook Pro Retina

Chad D - 11 years ago

I failed to mention that if I view it at 360p/480p it instantly goes up to ~4Mb/s download speed. Switch to 1080p or 4K, drops down to the aforementioned ~250Kb range. Not static, it varies from 80Kb/s to 350Kb/s usually.

Chad D - 11 years ago

When YouTube only serves up videos at about 250KB/s(or less), this is a failure.

ALEI HSU - 11 years ago

cool

SiriusTexra - 11 years ago

4k video with compression makes it look like 1080p footage tbh.

Audiospawn's Sudzy Bubbles - 11 years ago

My boner is ready.

okhabin - 11 years ago

but the surf is like.. completely flat. bad promotion

Michael Scotti - 11 years ago

where the waves at tho?

yzchenwei - 11 years ago

I don't think you can identify any difference which aboves 540p/480p.

Michał Uzbek - 11 years ago

2 Mb/s internet connection= very long waiting :D

frostyknight52 - 11 years ago

I love how my computer cant handle this. Me " I have an amazing Apple computer" Video: " Shutup already. I dominate everything

Haftepaff - 11 years ago

I've read somewhere that most anime is in 720p, so there won't be much of a difference. If we're lucky then 1080p will be mainstream in the anime industry when 4K becomes available. They're preparing the 4k monitors in case they're hosting the olympics 2020 (if memory serves me right).

ZANE SAMA - 11 years ago

fuck yeah!!!

angrymarketing5 - 11 years ago

Japan is already preparing to adopt 4K TV chanels in 2014. Can't wait for delicious 4K anime.

Videogamer1010 - 11 years ago

Completely black :( only audio

Joe Barbaro - 11 years ago

You cant play video on windows 3.1

Horus - 11 years ago

fehim - 11 years ago

8 mbt dsl 0,65 upload 64 tl yav he he

AMA200707 - 11 years ago

FFS, works as butter on imac. Oh GOSH, i started to see 1080p (a little bit) creepy VLC did not run the sound thou, i used quick time. Don't know whats next!!!!

nayeli atencio - 11 years ago

4 k o.O

gameone5555 - 11 years ago

16:6 is multi is bullshitt so as 16:10 16:7 16:9 is ok but the middle is the best 16:7 (16:8) 16:9 the picture is better because 2xheight = widht 2:1

gameone5555 - 11 years ago

1K 2K 4K 8K is nothing others as 16:8 formate much better than 16:9 ^^

GoldenKappa - 11 years ago

Hhaahahahaha

zaza_kurdistani - 11 years ago

hahah yeah !

collectiveshade - 11 years ago

Imagine what this will do for porn.

Armand Klein - 11 years ago

2096: This was RECORDED

Easy Katka - 11 years ago

Not really bro "retina display" is 2560x1600 and thats the resolution my monitor has for my windows pc.

Sach Alvarez - 11 years ago

i cant see any pixel of the video, this is awesome or im blind??

Sach Alvarez - 11 years ago

lo puedo ver sin tarjeta grafica y me da 135 fps con un amd fx-8150

Sahara - 11 years ago

Tremendo viaje y video por esas olas invisibles.... jajajajaja

piripitiflautica4!thebest ssd - 11 years ago

a la mierda lo vere en 240p fuck 4k

Horus - 11 years ago

2096: This was recorded with a potato

MulleDK19 - 11 years ago

This video contains approx. 29 billion, 444 million, 14 thousand and 80 pixels.

Klopalb - 11 years ago

0.5 fps on XP pentium IV

Douglas - 11 years ago

"YouTube allows a maximum upload resolution of 4096 × 3072 (12.6 megapixels).[4][5] However, YouTube's web-based video player is limited to a maximum of only 2048 × 1536 (3.1 megapixels).[6] 4K videos on YouTube can still be downloaded in their original resolution using a YouTube downloader." - Wikipedia

scaleop4 - 11 years ago

I'd be surprised if you ever got that far lol

Cole Olson - 11 years ago

Whatching on my 440 ppi droid DNA. Not bad but its not mind blowing

Antonio Barbato - 11 years ago

are not 4k, right click on the video and select SHOW VIDEO INFO, you can see the real resolution that is 2048x1536...all videos of the playlist have the same resolution... So is just a bit more than a fullhd but no a 4k

angerock49 - 11 years ago

Nobody cares, the point is do you have an actual 4K definition screen ?!

Orçun Kansoy - 11 years ago

640KB memory can plays at 1 frame per month. y u no know ?

yuji2006special - 11 years ago

I remember the time when I lived in NY.

nazlim09 - 11 years ago

mine doesn't play smooth..sobs :(

Chris Guillen - 11 years ago

There were no waves

Warkrave - 11 years ago

iMac with windows bootcamp and it's good :D

Tiagogbf - 11 years ago

4k no meu monItor a tela fika toda preta e vermelha

sralexandre5555 - 11 years ago

$200 Notebook APU and i can play this sh*t,so stfu about your specs.

gustavo sampaio - 11 years ago

lag on movie KKKKKKKK best video

PitPetHD - 11 years ago

i7 8 nucleos a 3.4 Ghz 16 GB de RAM y 3 GB de Gráfica... No puedo verlo.... La conexion de internet es de 10 MB Pantalla 24 pulgadas Full HD

Miquel Aparicio - 11 years ago

this technology would be awesome in 48 fps, do you agree?

miniskunk - 11 years ago

Runs smooth. Can't tell if frames are skipping if they are. NIce to see a video feed that truely gives my display full resolution instead if the heavily compressed so called 1080p that youtube normally provides.Yes you have to let it buffer up a bit before playing but that is understandable. HP Envy 17 laptop, 1080p display with i7 running at 2.7ghz turbos to 3.8ghz and Radeon 7850m graphics.

Kalyanaraman Narasingam - 11 years ago

Just before the girl wakes the old man, he was wearing glasses which dissappears in the next frame!

obiekt19 - 11 years ago

same here but with 20mb internet and it runs about 3 or 4 fps...

SjefeNoverSjef - 11 years ago

AMD prossesor, 2.5ghz, 6 gb ram and still lags wtf :S

Sagaepic - 11 years ago

will not

Sagaepic - 11 years ago

i3 (3,3 Ghz *2) 6GB Ram 16Mbps connection, sometimes i can see a frame...

Zumpelvelder - 11 years ago

Even if your pc is fast enough to show this content smoothly, I guess no one has a display large enough to show al the details a 4K resolution has to offer.

Olly Stabler - 11 years ago

Saw a difference between 4k and 1080p but not a massive difference. Computer played it fine but 1080p looks fine so I think I'll stick to that!

Chien H. - 11 years ago

4k lags, that's the difference

Pastor Gains - 11 years ago

1080p a.k.a Full HD is only quarter of 4K - Full HD- 1920x1080 4K- 4096x2304 .. That's a bloody diff ;)

BayramJ - 11 years ago

snake

Smooth Progression - 11 years ago

Thank you

Smooth Progression - 11 years ago

Thank you

Andrew Denisyuk - 11 years ago

it you want acual 4k res.; click the '' original '' button

XxHardcorexxGamerxX - 11 years ago

Ha! My computer couldn't even play it without lagging!

Aleksandr Vysockij - 11 years ago

get a better connection

Johannes mlk - 11 years ago

click on original guys, :)

Wes Jerentosky - 11 years ago

then how come it looks better than 1080p on my asus i7 8gb ram

Andrés Gómez - 11 years ago

Windows 3.1, Intel 80286, 640 KB of RAM, 20 MB HDD, No graphic card, Internet 28k, 4K loads in 5 years and plays at 1 frame per minute.. Before computer explodes!

rickydicky27 - 11 years ago

My question is, what do you use to film this?

Fernando Marquez - 11 years ago

am i the only one trying to play this video on a 480p?

Solo- Johnson - 11 years ago

So the iPad with retina display will or will not show true res?

Nirvana - 11 years ago

I have one and it look ... WoW :D

Fat and Single - 11 years ago

GUYS unless you have a Mac Book Pro with Retina display, these videos are only 1080p

262kk - 11 years ago

AMD phenomii x4, AMD 7770, and 4 GB of ram and it runs smoothly with no problem :D

Haskovo Badema - 11 years ago

ok guys im leaving it to buffer on the mooring i hope it will be ready to watch

emilio guerid - 11 years ago

Me not y have 100mb

David Brooks - 11 years ago

that quality jalkfjklajvklajifw.

Brandon Cole - 11 years ago

Original Quality had my laptop skipping frames terribly... So I had to settle for 1080p. :(

E Mills - 11 years ago

who ever said 240 looks good by the way obviously has a really bad computer where comfortability has overweighed discovery!!

E Mills - 11 years ago

bottom line PC computers had its days of living, but sad to say it is over for that. viruses, pop up, that annoying friend mcafe or whatever the hell that anti virus agent is sucks!! get a mac you wont have any troubles. once you go mac you never go back!! i can only say but so much, you have to have one to fully understand and enjoy a beautiful peaceful life where your computer takes you wherever you wanna go in this digital world we live in. praise to the all-mighty MAC!!! R.I.P STEVE JOBS!!

DaVince21 - 11 years ago

240p IS enough to enjoy good content. There was some research about how much people minded low-quality video if the actual content is good, and it seems most people only mind the low quality at the beginning of the video. Afterwards it becomes meaningless because you're sucked into a good story or whatever. Of course, high quality IS preferrable. But 240p will never stop being "good enough" if it's the only option (and if the video is entertaining enough).

Dark Fire - 11 years ago

18 megabyte or megabit?!

ZZ3435ff - 11 years ago

360p looks likr 720p dafuq

mikedundee1979 - 11 years ago

you need glasses dude!

Léo Miguel - 11 years ago

É um dia pra carrega e outro dia pra destrava da pagina ;d

Eric Lopes - 11 years ago

Phenom II Quad, 4GB of RAM, GeForce 9600gt and 35mb internet. Plays smooth (;

The Sexy Bits Channel - 11 years ago

"loads like a bitch!

The Sexy Bits Channel - 11 years ago

i5, 8gb ram on windows 7. 2gb graphics card hd. 20mb broadband...... loads like a bit plays like a dream lol takes about 4 minutes for it to actualy start loading then it plays great

Leinod6 - 11 years ago

LOL I can't even play this... it's all just black...

88xLord - 11 years ago

uhh i dont know too much about surfing but im pretty sure no one does it if there is no waves..

slash249 - 11 years ago

240p is ok for the first youtubers :)

Azzam allehyani - 11 years ago

no need for more than 1080p

nitramf - 11 years ago

yeah. macbook retina does it too

Grote Lul - 11 years ago

my computer is struggling to playback this vid and its not even a low end pc

Henrique Silva - 11 years ago

I played in my 2005's computer, and it exploded

Austin Dillow - 11 years ago

i have a 2560 by 1440 pixels screen

Austin Dillow - 11 years ago

This isn't actually 4k. 4k is 3840 × 2160, but 4k was taken off youtube a little while ago. If you right click and look at the video info, it streams at 2048x1536. Great video though

jbberinger - 11 years ago

550m**

jbberinger - 11 years ago

i7 and 12GB RAM, GeForce 55m graphics card. 100Mbps Internet connection....4k loads like a dream and plays like butter.

JouwTuube - 11 years ago

Downloaded realtime and played smooth :D Happy with my computer.

bellinibean - 11 years ago

OK, 4K is cool and new and everything, but your only going to see it in the highest resolution your display is capable.. in other words, if you have a 1080p display or a 720p display, that's the max resolution that will be displayed.

CinePat - 11 years ago

the first two seconds does not disappoint

alexelmilno - 11 years ago

nice waves.

gutterman99 - 11 years ago

man i must say ,the comment section is more entertaining than actual video. lol

Cristopher - 11 years ago

This video loads without problems here xD and its awesome *-*

NeeoDroid - 11 years ago

took me about 20 minutes to load the complete video.... finished in 2:10 minutes..

Patrick - 11 years ago

LOL

Patrick - 11 years ago

I clicked original and my computer shit itself

Slim Fandango - 11 years ago

1:36 a condom rolls by on the left

France Gall - 11 years ago

5 years later

Nikibi00 Bikini - 11 years ago

Green Screennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Lolllllllllllllllllllllll GG

MajinTAR - 11 years ago

At 4k you can see a Natural spirit on video

GiantTarget - 11 years ago

This looks excellent on my Tandy.

OnMyRock - 11 years ago

my video card is crying now.....

TheKINIIRS - 11 years ago

f f f f u u c k k i i n g g g *BSOD*

ACxii - 11 years ago

Shouldn't there actually be surfing in this so called "surf" video?

unidentified suspect - 11 years ago

U need the Mc Book Pro Retina for 4k videos..

Victor Vasquez - 11 years ago

theres no waves bro but i love the resolution thanks

Shayd - 11 years ago

To get full quality you need screen that actually has 4K resolution which isn't in retail sale and no PC GPU is actually capable of displays that resolution, you can do it by multiple Displays trough multiple wires but that doesn't count, Not HDMI not DVI supports it. So ram is least of your worries

Shayd - 11 years ago

Stop hating on mac so much assholes will be assholes and they will pay money for anything with Apple logo on it because Apple = 90% Marketing 10% Technology, You can't explain to someone that he just spend 2700$ on MAC he could spend 1500$ on PC

Shayd - 11 years ago

RAM? What the hell has RAM here to do, you need CPU to decode it, and you need a good one I havd Core 2 Duo 2.9Ghz in laptop and it stutters. Afterall it's 4x 1080p

Diego Torpoco Barrera - 11 years ago

maybe is overpriced but what's the deal, if people have the money to buy it let them do it, it's also about the apple logo and we all know it, there are people the will not buy something 4 times cheaper just because apple can offer it.... what's the point? there are rich people in the world and that's ok for me, i don't complain, i'm happy with what i have

Jason Lam - 11 years ago

it loaded 10 seconds :) After 2 days :)

The Beast - 11 years ago

Watching it on my MacBook Pro with Retina Display and it looks crap. The compression on YouTube makes such a mess of 4K video.

Buda Dangol - 11 years ago

same

AllThingsPaintball - 11 years ago

I have a macbook pro it is absolute garbage.

GZ Broadcast - 11 years ago

WAIT XD he thinks he will cheat me xD this is 2048x1536 xD no 4k but 2k

GZ Broadcast - 11 years ago

You imagine a 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999p screen? o.O

AllThingsPaintball - 11 years ago

Get a life. Yeah just the comeback i expected from an Apple Fanboy. Oh well this has been fun let us go our separate ways and continue living. How do you say?

NickBVlogs - 11 years ago

Get a life bro.....Get a life........smh......

AllThingsPaintball - 11 years ago

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WHOA WATCH OUT BADASS. Yeah right charging almost 400 dollars for a 100-200 processor yeah right. Have fun getting butt fucked by apple. :)

NickBibboProductions - 11 years ago

It's a i7 quad core in the retina.

AllThingsPaintball - 11 years ago

LOL 1300 for a dual core processor PFFT haha okay.

Paramite - 11 years ago

You know? Mac Book Retina don't support 4k. Even no 1080p

NickBVlogs - 11 years ago

Not to mention how thin and light it is. try to pack all that in a window machine.

NickBVlogs - 11 years ago

It's alright bro, I suffered with windows for YEARS before my new Macbook Retina. Editing photo's and videos is a dream with this mac. NO MORE CRASHES like windows.

AllThingsPaintball - 11 years ago

It's not hating if its true macbooks are garbage Windows FTW.

NickBVlogs - 11 years ago

Haters gonna hate....(writing this on my Retina Macbook) =D

Shayd - 11 years ago

I can't even watch it, stutters like some Apple Mac

Shayd - 11 years ago

Oh yeah you can see so much on 15 fucking inch display, seriously? It's not even half 4K

Jon Kraig - 11 years ago

This doesn't even stress my PC. Runs it like it's 240p, hahaha

snake172 - 11 years ago

FFFUUUUUU!!!!!!

AllThingsPaintball - 11 years ago

My macbook can't run this video what fucking garbage mac computers are.

jimmi der - 11 years ago

Actually you should be able to download at 2.5 MB/s, and if you don't reach those speeds on speedtest[dot]net or something, you should call your ISP, and get a reduction on the price of your internet. And maybe you should also counter in the fact that i live in Denmark and i only pay the equivelance of 10 US dollar fo my internet connection..

jimmi der - 11 years ago

100 Mb/s is not that uncommon... Rebember it's 100 Megabit per second, NOT 100 MegaByte per second. (notice the capital and lowercase "B" , "b") 100 Megabit per second is equivelant to about 12 MegaBytes per second. So i am an educator now apparently :-/ I did not mean to come off arrogant or like a know-it-all, and if i did i am sorry :(

jimmi der - 11 years ago

Right now i have 100Mb/s :D

iplikator - 11 years ago

You're probably using the HTML5 player, Original option is only available in the Flash version.

david M - 11 years ago

I'm lovin my 50" 3D tv right now

Phriswithaph - 11 years ago

I didn't even know macbooks were capable of handling 4k

Dan C - 11 years ago

Haha so am i

Jamike Felix - 11 years ago

xeon 3480, not a single lag here.

Paradox Productions - 11 years ago

Well ... You Know ... Incredible ... Unbelievable ... Amazing ... Exceptional ... And stuff ... You Know ...

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

Hey, I'm probably gonna buy that mac so can you tell me how good it looks

Wishful Thinking! - 11 years ago

butter smooth here.. gotter love i7 3820 :D

Chris - 11 years ago

It's not even in 4k, right click, click on 'Show video info', and in the top left corner it reads that it is 2048x1536.

jimmi der - 11 years ago

It took 10 seconds to buffer in 4K resolution... i love my internet connection <3

jimmi der - 11 years ago

No no... you are just an idiot cheater!

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa - 11 years ago

Got fios quantum. HOLY SHIT THE WHOLE VIDEO LOADS IN ORIGINAL QUALITY IN 3 SECONDS

Colin Allgaier - 11 years ago

sure hope the waves get better than that

nateo200 - 11 years ago

Downloading just to transcode to ProRes 4444 and edit in FCP.....bwahahaha can't wait for my MacBook to shit a brick!

Electro cube - 11 years ago

on 27 imac look amazing !!!!

ThreatTV - 11 years ago

Why i can use only the 1080p resolution?

Paradox Productions - 11 years ago

I'm lovin my Macbook pro retina right now...

Saفi - 11 years ago

my projector i used to hate now i am loving it after watching this video in 3840*2160 !,

SIV - 11 years ago

looks good.

Daniel Adónis - 11 years ago

240p + Full screen... best combination ever

Aikay373 - 11 years ago

Looked well good on my 1024x768 screen!!!

Will - 11 years ago

yeah in movie theatres, and they cost thousands of dollars

sealwannabe3 - 11 years ago

when this is full screen some of my gpu is being used but my quad core cpu is pegged at 100% 4K videos will need better deocding options in order to become mainstream

lilsj206 - 11 years ago

well I have a hackintosh.. I'm serious I am watching it at original quality full resolution with out any problem.

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

There're already 4k and 8k displays

Ishaan S - 11 years ago

by 4k capabilities i was thinking processing power but displays, that's a different story. there's that 7-foot sony with 4k capabilities release not too long ago, all you need is that cheap tablet and that tv (its probably $10k)

xzaxx - 11 years ago

for you to see the reolution of the device you have to have a device that is capable of showing it

xzaxx - 11 years ago

alot of pc and tvs can do that too. but the matter is not playing it it is showing the graphic of 4k. for example a blue ray film that has a high resolution graphic have to have full HD tv to see the high resolution of the picture. or lets for instant take playstation 3. playstation 3 games is games in HD resolution to see the HD resolution you must have HD tv.

Ishaan S - 11 years ago

regular cheap android tablets for less than $200 that runs a dual A10 1.5ghz chip can play 4k resolution

Ishaan S - 11 years ago

2048 x 1536? no, not 4k typical 4k is 3840x2160 4k's definition supports up to 4096 x 3072

xzaxx - 11 years ago

yes you do need 4k pc or tv or a screen with 4k capibilities.

Ronaldo Costa - 11 years ago

4K = LAG tyvm old crap PC! kkkkkk

akrohto210 - 11 years ago

stupid comcrap internet

Nicolas Silva - 11 years ago

i cant see the original :( i saw this video in january, the original resolution was available but now is gone :/

Rezwan Syed - 11 years ago

What are u guys talking about? this video runs fine on original size on my pc. whats so special about it. someone plz enlighten me.

Dreamssurfer - 11 years ago

i3 with intel HD 4gb ram playing it without a single problem at Original

Angelo Di Gianvito - 11 years ago

the only good part of my pc is my screem a panosonic smart viera 3D 42"

Angelo Di Gianvito - 11 years ago

you bastards =( buuu i have my stupid dual core i5200 with 4gb drr2 ram , and my sad gt220 drr3 of course i have problems with the video lol!!!!

Tim Fontana - 11 years ago

i7 2600k @ 4.8Ghz, 16GB RAM, GTX 680, 100Mbps fibre... No problems ;)

lilsj206 - 11 years ago

This video just played for me in original format in 10 secs just fine.. MacPro 2010 i7..

pedrofredo - 11 years ago

IMAX at home :)

scope256 - 11 years ago

Now I know what i'm asking Santa for this Christmas! :D

Alex Covington - 11 years ago

My computer can't even handle it!

Brettkenster - 11 years ago

These walmart netbooks arent what they used to be!

Profoundsoup - 11 years ago

I watched it on Original and i have no lag what so ever.....

Rafael Hongaro - 11 years ago

Phenom x3 710 - 2.6Ghz to x4 with unlocked core is 70% maximum. Radeom HD4850 VGA at 16% maximum.

Nation4202007 - 11 years ago

mac sucks

cliffjumpingisfun - 11 years ago

base line mbp 2011 is handling this just fine...if only my 14 mbps internet could keep up lol

playstation4855 - 11 years ago

my computer starts lagging at 720p yet alone 1080p but 4k ... (one millenium later) "look honey the first frame popped up" =3

LeoTheTiger80 - 11 years ago

I can play this with minimal lag using 200mbps+ internet and radeon hd 6570

Jules Anthony - 11 years ago

weird, video resolution says 2048x1536...

homeboylx - 11 years ago

I have a MacBook Pro 2009 13in base model and is very laggy, also my very fast reliable internet cant keep up with the data through put it requires. I have Comcast Business base package @ 12mbps which is consistent or a little faster after speed boost.

Zhinkk - 11 years ago

Mines not laggy at all :D 6870 ftw

Michael Harrison - 11 years ago

on the retina display macbook its a huge difference. 1080 looks pixelated, this looks a lot better, this gives me hope. I was a little surprised at how bad everything looks (aside from apple's website) on this retina display.

Giorgos Manousakis - 11 years ago

mine was loading for 20 secs almost...I have very good internet

Giorgos Manousakis - 11 years ago

SELECT: PROTOTYPE....ABOVE 1080 PIXELS....

Wish0Fridayyyyyyy - 11 years ago

dafug laaaag

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

My god, all of my comments are on the top! I'm the best.

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

Oh my god, you're the rudest person who's ever replied me back. Please don't do anything to me.

Bruce Willis - 11 years ago

why does everyone keep talking about the video quality and shit, yet nobody mentions that he's a fucking idiot for going all the way from soho to rockaway without checking the surf report first lola

Rupert Warries - 11 years ago

What kind of screen are you watching on? Normal monitor wont show any difference as 1080p is the standard resolution limit :P

rijo14 - 11 years ago

Telmex (south american isp i think), i'm using wpa2 encrypted wifi.. sorry my english, but i think this happens because i live in south america, and it means "international download speed" is 3mb or 4 more or less.

Sazal Hossain - 11 years ago

u need a 4k screen lol like u cnt tell diff between 720p and 1080p if u dnt have a 1080p moniter

Autolycus Axxis - 11 years ago

ok maybe not less than a min but it sure was under like 2 or 3 mins

Monica Simon - 11 years ago

imho, i can't tell the difference b/t this 4k and 1080p...

Autolycus Axxis - 11 years ago

Who's your isp? I have Charter on 15 Mb/s and I downloaded less than a min.....

NomedX - 11 years ago

with my slower internet I was able to watch it without a problem. jelly?

gir1258 - 11 years ago

lol

rijo14 - 11 years ago

with 15mb internet takes 10 min to load full vid

justin case - 11 years ago

anamorphic lenses...

TrollinOnMyFace - 11 years ago

i care

iDroid7 - 11 years ago

oh, a slide show... *sniffs* Do you smell something burning?!

FireHotStudios - 11 years ago

i like my istone..

MrRafting - 11 years ago

I like my i3 with 2 cores, 4gb ram and 2mbp/s internet :D

TheDog7118 - 11 years ago

slow

Kamfshrai - 11 years ago

come on ipod touch 2nd gen! ... you can do it!

[uD]Mido - 11 years ago

Amazing

Josh Leyva - 11 years ago

wow. I bet you have a lot of money.

Josh Leyva - 11 years ago

hahahaha

Fayosi - 11 years ago

i like my 1ghz 64mb ram 60 x 40 13inch monitor with 54k dial up connection..

Dave Kinney - 11 years ago

It's a shame that surfer was too busy working on the video to check a surf report to find out it was flat that day.

LartDuDeplacement32 - 11 years ago

I like my Potato

Hippoli - 11 years ago

WHY INTERNET WHY U NO FAST ENUF. Lul, and I only got like 20 FPS so that's annoying too.

Eevee - 11 years ago

how many mb got this video?

Videopertti - 11 years ago

Oh yeah, I can play solitaire with low graphics.

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

Then 8K should be called '4k', actually

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

Hahaha, you must love it.

FoolyCoolio - 11 years ago

Dude, I would kill to have something like that. Even your Mac Pro. 4gb of ram here, 2.4ghz quadcore, 1gb ddr3 video memory with a 36mb/s connection. All self built though on a $120 budget so I can't complain!

GenkiElite - 11 years ago

Watched it on my "new iPad". I can't tell the difference.

Elliot Pearl-Sacks - 11 years ago

Lol, the "Kansas City" part ruined it...

Videopertti - 11 years ago

I like my HP, and its 1 core and its 1GB RAM, and my ½mbps internet...

tallnsexy63 - 11 years ago

sweet waves brah

Tran Binh - 11 years ago

1080p = 1920x1080 4k = 4096 x 2160 4k FTW

DeathCon88 - 11 years ago

It is 12 cores with 12 hyperthreads.

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

Maybe.

Rate Hate - 11 years ago

im a little confused. why would you tell Wallypcwhatever that no one cares about his computer configurations...when you did the exact same thing and stated your computer configurations? isn't that kind of hypocritical?

miras202 - 11 years ago

4K...? I don't think my eye wight is up to the task...

VampireFromTheAbyss - 11 years ago

Sore loser much?

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

Watch it in 240p

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

I like my Ferrari California, 100000000x better than be on a computer all day long.

TheEmoMyLife - 11 years ago

wysoka rozdzielczość ok ale szybkość ransmisji bitów w dźwięku nie dorównouje dobrej mp3. 199 kb/s audio ? słabiutko .

overcooler - 11 years ago

If you right click on the video and select "show video info", it actually says, that the resolution is 2048x1536. Now that's only 2k. 4k resolution is 3840x2160 or 4096x3076 or something like that. The horizontal resolution should be around 4000.

MaximusVX - 11 years ago

Click on my channel, and watch the latest video, im not saying that to get more views, but I'd rather not type it all in one comment xD

MaximusVX - 11 years ago

Haha yeah I see what you mean, I just built a computer on the 14th this month, my very first build

MaximusVX - 11 years ago

So you have eight 30 inch monitors on one table?

Alex Zodiacal - 11 years ago

was this shot with a canon c300?

Camden1101 - 11 years ago

Lets all name or pc specs and think we are cool -_-

WhiteSoundCL - 11 years ago

I love my notebook samsung rf511 Intel core i5 8 gb RAM 4mbps 2 gb videocard and a nice mouse

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

Yeah, tell it to someone who cares...

MANTECKA Yay - 11 years ago

STFU

DaShaihulud - 11 years ago

Video Info shows resolution of 2000x1500 only!?

sccrlover015 - 11 years ago

I like to switch between 240p and 4K

IgnaceBM - 11 years ago

I like my mac pro better, and its 12 cores and its 32GB RAM, and my 140mbps internet...

Crimson Nyte - 11 years ago

nice!

RoboPhysic - 11 years ago

Still couldn't even watch it... need a 4k moniter thats like 10,000 bucks...

Psychoshin - 11 years ago

same as you Bro :<

Kenn - 11 years ago

i can watch 2 of 4k resolution videos at the same time. hm... i7.....

RaptorX88 - 11 years ago

I have a 512kbps connection. FUCK THIS SHIT

المرشدي - 11 years ago

The video is 4K, but it depends on your screens resolution

Crimson Nyte - 11 years ago

How? Btw, like i've said to other people, i posted this comment on my cousin's computer. On my own, it just lags a bit.

Sassewere - 11 years ago

You are an idiot...

dagluke - 11 years ago

Where's the waves...

tvdaXD - 11 years ago

hmmm lets see..... AH there it is "Original" *click* RIP old nVdia.....

NZ - 11 years ago

Hi there, could you share 4K encode rate, vbr/cbr and number of passes? Thanks, David

MrMinecraftn00b - 11 years ago

Wow, Surf NYC and he doesn't even surf. Nice quality though.

Саша Грей - 11 years ago

У кого комп глючит при включении 4к?

Саша Грей - 11 years ago

Пипец,если что небудь выше 4к будет,мой комп сгорит сразу

Entide Productions - 11 years ago

Turn on original: computer melts.

Fritz Brave - 11 years ago

4K looks great!!!!

bigbezet - 11 years ago

So you have one of the few monitors that are capable of displaying that resolution? Lucky you...

LeopoldvonCarstein - 11 years ago

2 min? For me it was 26 seconds :P

Slurp Wizard - 11 years ago

Only took me like 2 mins to load

Slurp Wizard - 11 years ago

Im watching at 4K...

Dadude0908 - 11 years ago

50 mbps connection no problem

Jim .Bob - 11 years ago

my resolution is 5k :D

Digger Dalton - 11 years ago

no waves

bigbezet - 11 years ago

The problem here is that out of the 600000+ views this had probably one or two people were able to view it at 4K...

Crimson Nyte - 11 years ago

yeah i do.

monkeh88 - 11 years ago

what camera

Johnny Brick - 11 years ago

It may be 4k yeah but it needs an hour to load. :D

Michael Minnich - 11 years ago

nigger

Ethan321 - 11 years ago

i need a 4k screen

Ethan321 - 11 years ago

press original hd

simdude2u - 11 years ago

you must have an older computer.

Victor Dizon - 11 years ago

there are no waves

razorree - 11 years ago

one reasonable reason to watch 4k is to have >150'' display

Crimson Nyte - 11 years ago

of course i dont. but when i wached it, this was on my cousin's computer. it lags a bit on my own computer

TheCoon324 - 11 years ago

fuck yeah, i can watch this in orginal without even any lag...

stinkykyle96 - 11 years ago

you dont have a 4k monitor... hmmm

Crimson Nyte - 11 years ago

I know now.

Fahad Senur - 11 years ago

i just bought my computer, but youtube loves ruin it to me

Dr. Pavel I'm CIA - 11 years ago

And here come the day, when the videos "system requirements" are too high for my ye'olde computer.

SuperFlashDriver - 11 years ago

I have a Mac and when it comes to Original HD, It almost looks like it's smooth but it still has some bumpy frames along the way. Everything else on the other hand, it looks great. =D

Proxima Centauri - 11 years ago

If you have a laptop, it will explain everything. It depends on your screen resolution.

perry842 - 11 years ago

Wow, my laptop lags like hell when watching this in 4K... Oh well... Realistically 1080p is more than enough for me.

Nathan Platt - 11 years ago

Im watching it on its original resolution. ;)

odddFutureWolfHaley - 11 years ago

i can watch it :)!!

AngryApeTV - 11 years ago

Wonder how long it will be before 4k comes to consumer level camcorders and TVs, my guess is 5-10 years.

kold - 11 years ago

to watch it full resolution you have to make it full screen!

Cloud Se - 11 years ago

it's been compressed so much that Original looks like 720p anyway. Fucking fail.

rockhopper123452 - 11 years ago

Probly The RED epic or canon c300

Janson Chang - 11 years ago

Opened 3 tabs in original quality and was pretty smooth on my laptop. (:

Ian Ethan - 11 years ago

I don't even have Original as an option. : /

mohamed mostafa - 12 years ago

plz which camera did u use

BleakVision - 12 years ago

I wish people would use LESS depht of field. 4k of 60% blurry images is rather pointless.

troyasee - 12 years ago

no surf

Will891410 - 12 years ago

orinal quality to me looks equally the same like 1080p. but if you zoom it u see the difference.

Ma Thieu - 12 years ago

AMD Phenom II x6 1605t -> I win, my dear.

Crimson Nyte - 12 years ago

i cant watch it higher than 1080p. hm...

Malte - 12 years ago

If you watch this on a netbook, you can cook coffe on the processor and watch a slideshow!

hotstreak864 - 12 years ago

Doesn't work well on my 27" iMac (Late '09) with ATI Radeon HD 4670.

ABU 98 - 12 years ago

i can play 1080p and 4k but 4k is chopy

Ian Ethan - 12 years ago

Sorry, that's what I meant... 'Original' isn't there, 1080p's the last option. I've played other 4k videos on YT so I doubt there's a limiter removing the option. Refer to sillyedd's top comment, it's not letting him play it above 720p for some reason...

General Dank - 12 years ago

lol, of course it's smooth if it's only being rendered at 2048×1536 (iPad resolution) or 1920x1080 (Roku)... resolutions which those devices are supposed to support. It's pointless to say that a 4k movie is running "smooth" unless you have a GPU which can actually render that resolution (e.g., 4096x2160) and a screen which can actually display it... otherwise it's just being down-rendered to the max resolution your device is capable of (which is far from 4k, for most people).

IakonaWayne - 12 years ago

5760 x 1080 via 3 monitors. lol :)

IakonaWayne - 12 years ago

Yep me. :)

Sounds of Niko - 12 years ago

on what waves?

Dicu Andrei - 12 years ago

only works with IE9 for me

ksadogawa - 12 years ago

No waves on the movie.

Dicu Andrei - 12 years ago

Amd Athlon II x4 640-2 videos same time, no lag xD.

Ian Ethan - 12 years ago

Um... there's no option to play this in 4k. I'm using an i7, 6gb RAM and 100mbps connection. I didn't think hardware would be a limitation for me...

Dooky7 - 12 years ago

4k??? I have only 1080p in settings... why is that?

ian moone - 12 years ago

that's probably true because russia is poor

Robert Shehan - 12 years ago

I'm having the exact same problem. Although I'm not really seeing a difference between 240p and 720p.

sillyedd - 12 years ago

youtube doesn't allow me to watch this in more than 720p which is interesting.

Chris Bailey - 12 years ago

Should have checked Surfline Morgan

TheDog7118 - 12 years ago

has anyone try to play in 4K and run like picture silde show slow

Caolán D - 12 years ago

@Kuikli2 Not possible. YouTube only supports up to 30fps.

zoemesty - 12 years ago

Also smooth as a baby's bum on a 1080p Roku, along with aforementioned New iPad. We're living in a different world boys.

hotstreak864 - 12 years ago

Is choppy as hell on a MacBook with a GeForce 9400M.

المرشدي - 12 years ago

8800GTX is smooth as boobs

zoemesty - 12 years ago

Buttery smooth on the new iPad and its 3 million pixels

Charles Wong - 12 years ago

Watching this on my ol' 9400gt without any lag :)

stablizershock - 12 years ago

@rlmorgan95 That's not I said that's what Steve Jobs said so now you are stupid

المرشدي - 12 years ago

looks good on my Super Amoled HD screen

stablizershock - 12 years ago

@vassillioss its because than it becomes retina display like in iphone 4 and ipad 3

Tom Heal - 12 years ago

@vassillioss original is much better quality than 1080p, its what they have in imax theatres Plus it would look astoundingly clear unless you screen was insanely big, like over 4000x4000

vassillioss - 12 years ago

why does "origina" look so much better than "1080p" on a 1440 x 900 laptop screen? seriously can anyone answer that?

Caolán D - 12 years ago

29.97 fps on a GTX 580. Smooth as a baby's bottom.

K3ViNPwNz- - 12 years ago

i played the video on original quality and pc froze!

James Pfaff - 12 years ago

@gainpro thanks bro...

Shanbobbie Moore - 12 years ago

@TheFilmSlasher :D

gainpro - 12 years ago

@BOB1BERSERKER cool story bro. where do you buy one? nuff said. "bro"

James Pfaff - 12 years ago

@gainpro sorry bro there were 4k resolution tv's at ces this year(3840x2160) lg 85 inch

James Pfaff - 12 years ago

now i need a 4k res 85inch flatscreen

Felipe Marinho - 12 years ago

Thanks i7

ape_master - 12 years ago

lol those waves were barely surfable.

Dylan Tucker - 12 years ago

The perfect internet speed test. Went from 10MBPS to 35. "Hey internet, I know you used to struggle with 1080p but I need you to load this 4K footage" "No problem, boss."

Evan Howells - 12 years ago

@gainpro yeah, just wish i had the set up for it.... I've got a monitor that supports 1920x1200P but thats as close as i'll get for now.

gainpro - 12 years ago

@h4x0y oh you right about the pixel density, well what ever it doesn't matter, the main comment was about max res and as of this date, we can get 2560x1600, -and considering how far off topic we got- that's that, end of discussion, nough said, sayonara, will not read next reply, done with this ridiculous shit. o/

h4x0y - 12 years ago

@gainpro 5:4 is mainly the 1280x1024 resolution which is hard to find these days. and 16:10 WAS a standard until about 2008, now all leading companies are striving towards a consistency that all monitors are 16:9 (whether media or computer indrusty), you can have a look at their websites to see their current products. Density is higher on the 27", if you do the math, it's 109ppi for the 27" and 101ppi for the 30" with 2560x1600.

gainpro - 12 years ago

@h4x0y no monitor a tv above 1080 is going to be interlaced.... you don't have to put "p" cause i'm pretty sure i'll know it's progressive... anyways the 30" 2560x1600 is the same pixel density as it's 16:9 counterpart, hence why it's at 27". here's where your probably confused. the industry your talking about, is the media industry, in fact it is them who started the 16:9 ratio as a standard, now what i'm talking about... is the computer industry, and the two ratio standards are 5:4 and 16:10.

h4x0y - 12 years ago

@gainpro apples 27" display is great for prosumers. Higher quality displays are only needed by specific professionals, and cost some grands more than apples thunderbolt display. Generally all 16:10 displays are being replaced by smaller, higher pixel density 16:9 displays (30" 1600p -> 27" 1440p, 24" 1200p -> 21" 1080p). The industry is moving towards 16:9 and you can read as many articles as you want about it, prove me wrong. >1080p is still a tiny percentage of monitors at the moment.

gainpro - 12 years ago

@h4x0y most 2560x1440 monitors are used for color and lighting accuracy(which i can guarantee you will not find with mac products, generally their ok, but they're for the masses) and is in the 16:9 media standard. as for the res i mentioned, it is the max res for dvi, and is the highest available for the masses, and also offers the 16:10 standard for all computing tasks, which offers more real-estate. history? or a ratio that doesn't fit your needs? considering the imac, it's ratio not for you.

h4x0y - 12 years ago

@gainpro yeah almost 5% of all computer monitors has that resolution. Besides, you mean 2560*1440, because the 1600p monitors are 16:10 aspect ratio which is history. I have a 2560*1440 iMac which has stunning display performance, and I have to say all those youtube videos look awfully compressed. At the time of writing, <= 1080p users aren't really missing anything.

gainpro - 12 years ago

@evanjames93 1920x1080 is actually considered as a low resolution with a computer. it's all about 2560x1600 for now.

信仔 - 12 years ago

Vimeo HD looks WAY better than youtube 4K

dragonmustard2 - 12 years ago

Looks compressed. I'm watching it on my 2560X1440 display and it just looks like the video wasn't uploaded too well.

Lucio Cuddeford - 12 years ago

@joeyswichzerg That's because you're watching it in 720p

Joey Swichzerg - 12 years ago

IPod touch 4G Retina Display with A4 chip can plays this fine :)

StillSpy - 12 years ago

@CynicalVision True that!

CynicalVision - 12 years ago

@idan124 I think it's 4096 × 3112.

Evan Howells - 12 years ago

1080p was never quite good enough.

Cluck Snorris - 12 years ago

My Vista computer hates me now......

ALLoY202 - 12 years ago

ATI Eyefinity with 4 1920x1080 monitors arranged in a rectangle would play this at native res.

nopejpg - 12 years ago

My 4 year old gateway with an intel Q6600 at 3 Ghz plays this fine.

nopejpg - 12 years ago

@CynicalVision Its to test the power of our computer.

Luke Smith - 12 years ago

@CynicalVision looks beastly on a 2560x1440 monitor though :D

TheAngryDuckman - 12 years ago

ha, my laptop cannot play this video smoothly. GT540m here

theycallmeknives1 - 12 years ago

So i can run two windows of this playing at the same time. But if i open a third it gets all chop :(

bucky A - 12 years ago

Typical eastcoast skunk session. I know(jerzey surfer). Wot does he do wit black bag? Would like to see the true trip wit 4" snow, 36F air, 38F water, and pumping winter surf.

Killian Oh'Malley - 12 years ago

Finally a use for Eyefinity Resolutions.

tinchoTAringa - 12 years ago

more resolution than the reality ....

wtfisitpjur - 12 years ago

If I had a dollar for every pixel in this video, I'd have $4000

JoeBlackHDTV - 12 years ago

@wouterdeleeuwecht yea it really does

LinesGrey - 12 years ago

@CynicalVision split this video into 4 parts and watch every single one

unpaisa - 12 years ago

those are some small ass waves.

wouter de leeuw - 12 years ago

A macbook air 1,6 dual core plays this fine :)

TheFilmSlasher - 12 years ago

In soviet russia 240p is HD Resolution.

Raphael Vitor - 12 years ago

kk a minha é geforce 6200 kkk nem aguenta full hd 1080p

David Salma - 12 years ago

my graphic card can't stand 4k

Andrew Warwick - 12 years ago

the only way this would be more impressive than a 1080p video for instance, is with a MASSIVE, probably 3D without glasses, pristine detail TV or Monitor.

Federico Aquino - 12 years ago

high definition

Barbarian tutorials - 12 years ago

Nice graphics quality, but video is boring -.-

About Surf NYC (4K resolution)

The "Surf NYC (4K resolution)" video is part of the surfing, sexy girls, beach category, which contains similar videos like this one.